May 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2605.24564· 2 citations· 47 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
FinCAD is proposed, an inference-time adaptation of Context-Aware Decoding that attenuates contributions from memorised historical outcomes without retraining and raises the subset-averaged in-sample/out-of-sample Spearman correlation on an eleven-model leaderboard.
Abstract
Backtesting large language models (LLMs) on historical financial data is unreliable when their pre-training data include the evaluated events. An LLM trained in 2024 may already encode how stocks moved during 2018-2020. We name this failure parametric look-ahead bias and propose FinCAD, an inference-time adaptation of Context-Aware Decoding that attenuates contributions from memorised historical outcomes without retraining. FinCAD pairs an adversarial bias-discovery pipeline that learns a model-specific memory-activating prior prompt with an entity- and date-adaptive rule that scales the CAD strength using a per-(entity, date) confidence signal. Across five 7-14B LLMs and five mega-cap equities, the largest model-level mean in-sample return correction is -67.1%. For the three larger models, 2025 out-of-sample returns remain within $8K and mean Sharpe within $\pm$0.10 of baseline; mean general-benchmark accuracy remains positive or within -1.7 points for four of five models. On an eleven-model leaderboard, FinCAD raises the subset-averaged in-sample/out-of-sample Spearman correlation from +0.779 to +0.846, yielding rankings that are more closely aligned with post-cutoff performance.
This work evaluates continued pretraining on FineWeb-Edu dumps drawn strictly from after each model's knowledge cutoff, evaluated across six open-weight models spanning three families and four parameter scales, painting a more optimistic picture of time-incremental CPT than the prior continual learning literature sugge...
Firat Öncel, S. Ali, M. Ravanelli et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that the annual pretraining run is not necessary, and it is found that a small adapter is enough to add a new period to the knowledge an old checkpoint already encodes, and that this outperforms continued pretraining.
Seung-Han Lee, Jun Seo, Jaehoon Lee et al.· 0 citations
Training a language model on data with a narrow flaw can sometimes make the model broadly misaligned. Inspecting the data at face value often does not settle whether it will emerge, and today it is caught only after training, by auditing the resulting model. To complement post-hoc audits, we introduce Alignment Forecas...
Chen Yueh-Han, Bruce W. Lee, Ilia Sucholutsky et al.· 0 citations
Test-time training (TTT) lets a model store information in its weights during inference. When the model learns from its own output, however, each update also changes the model that generates the next training example. Across 128K-token streams, retaining generated-text updates worsens prediction on independent human-wr...
Cheng-Zhi Luo, Bing Li, Bernard Ghanem· 0 citations
This survey organizes recent optimizers and training optimization methods along four largely independent axes: temporal estimation, update geometry, horizon management, and representation and systems.
J-Access is proposed, an inference-time audit that uses the Jacobian lens to map intermediate representations into vocabulary space and measures how often target concepts remain accessible along the model's output pathway, positioning J-Access as a model-level diagnostic for assessing residual susceptibility in unlearn...
Zirui Song, Hua-Xing Liu, Xiang Wang et al.· 1 citation
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.