Skip to content

Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.30407 · 2 citations · 58 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This study formalizes Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering, a novel task designed to evaluate LLMs as autonomous data engineers that drive model specialization through end-to-end data curation, and charts a path toward agent-driven model specialization.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on general tasks, while often struggling to adapt to specialized domains without high-quality domain-specific data. Existing LLM-based data curation methods primarily rely on human-designed workflows, leaving it unexamined whether LLMs can autonomously execute an end-to-end data engineering pipeline for model specialization. We formalize Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering, a novel task designed to evaluate LLMs as autonomous data engineers that drive model specialization through end-to-end data curation. We frame data as an optimizable component and study agents that plan, generate, and iteratively optimize training data across multiple domains, guided by post-training performance improvement. Experiments show that autonomous LLM data engineers yield substantial gains, as GPT-5.2 constructs a training curriculum that improves a student model by 57.29%, entirely through iterative, agent-driven data adaptation. By illuminating both potential and bottlenecks, our study establishes autonomous data engineering as a measurable capability and charts a path toward agent-driven model specialization (Code will be released at https://github.com/zjunlp/DataAgent).

View source

Similar papers

Toward Self-Evolving Data Agents for Autonomous Data Analysis

Comparisons against stronger model and coding-agent competitors further indicate that both domain-specific agent runtime structure and foundation-model strength matter for autonomous data analysis.

Junhao Zhu, Lu Chen · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AutoData: Agentic Search for Pre-training Data Selection

The introduction of AutoData, an agent that searches directly over executable selection algorithms, suggests that data engineering can be treated as an agentic machine learning problem, extending autonomous research from model and training-code optimization to the data.

Yan Meng, Dhruv Srikanth, Bingchen Zhao et al. · 2 citations
Review Aug 2026

MUSE: An Interactive Meta-Agent for Understanding and Steering LLM-powered Data Science Systems

MUSE is presented, an interactive meta-agent that enhances user understanding and control of agentic data science systems by dynamically restructuring low-level execution traces into multiple semantic levels that support navigation from high-level overviews to low-level implementation details.

Wei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Yuan Tian et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

OmniHarness: Harnessing Generalizable Visual Generation via Symbolic Policy Learning

OmniHarness is introduced, a framework for generalizable visual generation via symbolic policy learning that abstracts verified executions into symbolic policies for visual generation task families, capturing shared procedures and applicability conditions while removing instance-specific inputs.

Xun Xu, Jin-Xiu Liu, Zhang-Bo Qiao et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Reliable AI Data Scientists: Data Agents with Workflow Harnesses

This paper examines Data Agents from a harness-centric perspective, introducing a taxonomy of Data Agents and associated data environments, and identifying four open reliability problems: inactive semantic calibration, missing clarification, missing experience transfer, and the missing verification-repair repository.

Hua-Chi Zhou, Yu-Jing Zhang, Jia-He Du et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

AutoDataBench: A Data-centric Testbed for Accelerating Auto Research

Existing auto-research benchmarks often entangle multiple sources of improvement, including training frameworks, hyperparameters, compute budgets, and data, making it difficult to attribute why one frontier agent outperforms another to specific research capabilities. In this work, we isolate and systematically evaluate...

Rui-Feng Yuan, Yi-Zhi Li, Ya-Xin Du et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.