Skip to content

Using Grounded Theory for Agent Behavior Analysis at Scale

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes AutoTraceGT (Automated Trace analysis through Grounded Theory), the first multi-agent pipeline that automates grounded theory on agent trajectories and suggests Grounded Theory offers a scalable analytic tool for ML researchers and agent developers studying what agents actually do.

Abstract

Understanding agent behavior requires methods that scale to thousands of trajectories and surface new patterns in long, often unfamiliar tasks where pre-built classifiers fall short. We propose to bring grounded theory into agent trajectory analysis: a six-decade-old qualitative method from the social sciences, with a principled saturation criterion and an auditable trail from data to theory. We propose AutoTraceGT (Automated Trace analysis through Grounded Theory), the first multi-agent pipeline that automates grounded theory on agent trajectories. It iteratively performs open, axial, and theoretical coding until saturation, producing a behavioral taxonomy tailored to each task. Across six trajectory corpora, AutoTraceGT produces codebooks that recover 73-91 percent of the failure modes in human-annotated taxonomies and surface additional patterns that those taxonomies miss. The emergent theoretical narrative aligns with prior expert accounts. Used as a deductive feature space, the codebook outperforms zero-shot and few-shot LLM baselines on downstream failure prediction. These results suggest Grounded Theory offers a scalable analytic tool for ML researchers and agent developers studying what agents actually do.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Trajectory Abstraction for the Science of Language Agent Behavior

Scientific studies of language agents need behavioral variables that support hypotheses across tasks and models. We formulate this research problem as learning and testing a hierarchy of trajectory abstractions. A concrete recursive procedure first measures role- and phase-indexed events, proposes temporally constraine...

Tian-Qiang Yan · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Guides That Cause Actions: An Offline Study of Guide-Action Mutual Reinforcement in Multimodal Web Agents

Web agents are usually evaluated in live environments, where environment state and judge models drift between runs, so the same checkpoint rarely reproduces the same score, making controlled studies of training phenomena impractical. We present WebMRE, an offline benchmark of 541 tasks and 5,293 steps derived from succ...

Cheng-Guang Gan, Yun-Hao Liang, Qing-Hao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

On the Behavioral Traits of LLM Agents

This work proposes A-B-D to infer traits bottom-up from behavioral data (B-data), namely how agents act on their environment and communicate with users, as recorded in existing trajectories, and offers a new lens for understanding AI personality.

Hao-Kai Zhao, Jie Gao, Yunze Xiao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don't

This work designs a contrastive study that combines controlled quantitative experiments with paired trajectory analysis and consolidates observations into a taxonomy of three high-level categories and twelve skill-use modes, showing that skills work when noisy trajectories become procedural anchors that stabilize execu...

Zhi-Yuan Jiang, Fan Huang, Hanwen Xing et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

MEA: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent System for Faithful Model Explanations

Recent years have seen the employment of a plethora of machine learning (ML) models in high-stakes domains, but they remain largely opaque to the practitioners who act on their predictions. While post-hoc explanation methods offer a lens into this model behavior, wielding them effectively demands expertise most domain...

Yu-Yang Cheng, Raghav Kaushik Ravi, Srivarshinee Sridhar et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations

This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...

Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.