Skip to content

Calibrating Small Language Models for Claim Check-Worthiness Detection

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

N-PPI is proposed, a pointwise extension of Prediction-Powered Inference that calibrates model predictions at inference time as a lightweight post-hoc layer, without re-training the underlying model, to make accurate check-worthiness detection substantially cheaper to operate at scale.

Abstract

Assessing claim check-worthiness is an essential first step in automated fact-checking pipelines. This work is motivated by a real deployment challenge at an early-stage startup: running large language models (LLMs) over every incoming claim is cost- and latency-prohibitive, yet smaller models sacrifice accuracy. We propose NN-PPI, a pointwise extension of Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) that calibrates model predictions at inference time as a lightweight post-hoc layer, without re-training the underlying model. NN-PPI achieves weighted F1 gains ranging from 12% to 33.80% depending on the size and performance of the baseline model, bringing SLMs on par with larger LLMs. Beyond few-shot SLMs, NN-PPI further improves a production-deployed fine-tuned model, demonstrating that residual calibration is complementary to supervised fine-tuning. By recovering LLM-level accuracy from models that are an order of magnitude cheaper to serve, it makes accurate check-worthiness detection substantially cheaper to operate at scale. Our code and data can be found at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/arr-claim-worthiness-F237.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

CruxBench: A Benchmark of Information Discovery

CruxBench is introduced, a benchmark that grades LLM-generated questions by their Value of Information (VOI): how much a model-proposed crux updates beliefs about a target forecasting question and finds that VOI correlates highly with independent measures of model capability and captures cruxes'usefulness for answering...

Hui Dai, Li-Na Piao, Nick Merrill et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Calibration as a First-Class Criterion in LLM Evaluation

It is argued that each NLP subfield should pair its main performance metric with a calibration score and call for treating calibration as an essential property of every model rather than a niche topic.

Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Katharina von der Wense · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Robust Numerical Claim Verification

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for claim verification, yet remain brittle for numerical reasoning: even small changes in value can sharply degrade accuracy. We show that this brittleness persists in frontier LLMs, but can be mitigated through adversarial fine-tuning on numerically perturbed examples. Usin...

Peter Røysland Aarnes, Vinay Setty · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Claim-Level Confidence Calibration for Reliable Decision Making with Large Language Models

Claim-level decomposition combined with post-hoc calibration reduces expected calibration error on factual questions while exposing failure modes on adversarial false-premise questions where decision-makers most need reliable uncertainty estimates.

Toghrul Abbasli, Kentaroh Toyoda, Yuan Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Models

Pinocchio is introduced, an external calibrator that estimates the correctness of responses from black-box API models that needs only a single forward pass to generate an uncertainty estimate and requires no access to the target model's logits, weights, or internal states.

K. D. Hayes, Arka Pal, Hao-Song Zhang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.