BIRD-History is introduced, a benchmark consisting of 1,393 tasks across 11 databases, designed to evaluate text-to-SQL systems'ability to ground underspecified natural language questions using historical SQL scripts, and a plug-in retriever that extracts five types of external knowledge from historical SQL scripts, then retrieves and reranks relevant fragments for query generation.
Abstract
While recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based text-to-SQL systems achieve impressive performance on standard benchmarks, they struggle when user queries implicitly rely on domain-specific knowledge, such as business logic, data conventions, and analytical practices, that is neither captured by the schema nor explicitly stated in the natural language question. Historical SQL query logs offer a valuable source of such knowledge, yet existing benchmarks do not adequately support evaluation of history-driven approaches. To address this gap, we introduce BIRD-History, a benchmark consisting of 1,393 tasks across 11 databases, designed to evaluate text-to-SQL systems'ability to ground underspecified natural language questions using historical SQL scripts. Each task is annotated with ground-truth labels specifying which historical queries contain relevant knowledge and which SQL clauses encode it, enabling systematic evaluation of both retrieval effectiveness and knowledge utilization. Alongside the benchmark, we propose a plug-in retriever that extracts five types of external knowledge from historical SQL scripts, then retrieves and reranks relevant fragments for query generation. The retriever integrates seamlessly into existing few-shot text-to-SQL pipelines without requiring prompt modifications. Experiments demonstrate consistent improvements across four text-to-SQL systems, highlighting the value of leveraging historical query logs for handling underspecified queries. Dataset and code are open-sourced on https://github.com/zjuidg/BIRD-History.
This work demonstrates Text2SQL-Eval, an open-source, modular framework for rigorous evaluation of text-to-SQL systems, which provides a comprehensive suite of over twelve metrics, spanning execution accuracy, SQL syntactic equivalence, and LLM-as-judge scoring.
Oktie Hassanzadeh, Yotam Perlitz, Nhan H. Pham et al.· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations
Results show that SQL verification can be performed with a lightweight learned model while retaining feature-level evidence for inspecting and diagnosing its predictions, and feature attribution shows that the model relies on both semantic grounding and deterministic SQL-structure signals.
N. Shukla, Debasmita Panda, Srutanik Bhaduri et al.· 0 citations
guided table retrieval is presented, a four-phase pipeline that combines deterministic grounding via hash-based predictors, structural exploration of join-graph reachability, LLM-powered disambiguation of sources and targets, and algorithmic merging into minimal, topologically ordered join trees.
Alekh Jindal, J. Pandey, C. Pavlopoulou et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that structured prompt engineering provides a practical alternative to model fine-tuning for locally deployed LLMs, offering an effective balance between SQL generation accuracy, computational efficiency, and data privacy.
Nurjayanti Nurjayanti, A. Adiwijaya, A. Romadhony et al.· Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Siste...· 0 citations
In this ablation, retrieved knowledge-base context provides the largest marginal improvement when added to the full oracle graph, and a distillation procedure that turns historical query profiles into reusable SQL reference cards is optimized.
A comprehensive text-to-SQL benchmarking framework with realistic RBAC constraints is presented, which features an LLM-assisted workflow that augments existing text-to-SQL benchmarks with plausible user roles and access policies, and contains evaluation metrics that identify RBAC-specific failure modes, and disentangle...
Yang Fei, Yangfan Jiang, Yin Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations