Dec 2025· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2512.15052· 1 citation· 47 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
SGM is extensible, and its combined defenses, denoted as SGM*, integrate with existing detoxification methods for stronger safety performance, providing an interpretable, low-cost solution for toxicity-controlled multimodal generation.
Abstract
Disclaimer: Samples in this paper may be harmful and cause discomfort. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) enable multimodal understanding but inherit toxic signals from weakly curated pretraining corpora, leading to explicitly toxic outputs, especially under adversarial triggers that late, opaque training-free detoxification methods struggle to handle. We propose SGM, a white-box neuron-level multimodal intervention that acts like safety glasses for toxic neurons: it recalibrates a set of toxicity-associated neurons via expertise-weighted soft suppression, neutralizing harmful cross-modal activations without any parameter updates. We establish MM-TOXIC-QA, a multimodal toxicity data framework, and compare SGM with existing detoxification techniques. Experiments on open-source MLLMs show that SGM mitigates explicit toxicity in standard and adversarial conditions, cutting average harmful rates from 45.0% to 4.5% while preserving fluency and multimodal reasoning. SGM is extensible, and its combined defenses, denoted as SGM*, integrate with existing detoxification methods for stronger safety performance, providing an interpretable, low-cost solution for toxicity-controlled multimodal generation.
L DeLFE, a lightweight controlled detoxification approach that identifies specific toxic features across model layers and performs targeted interventions on them, and designs three feature-level strategies that adjust intervention timing and strength to reconstruct the target model’s original activations.
Yu-Hu Shang, Xiang Cheng, Dian-Yun Wang et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have extended the capability of large language models (LLMs) to process more contextual multimodal information, showing remarkable progress in diverse realistic multimodal applications. Despite their strong perception and reasoning abilities, recent studies reveal that MLLMs rem...
Dai-Zong Liu, Junhao Dong, Zhi-Yuan Ma et al.· IEEE transactions on multime...· 0 citations
As Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) transition toward natively unified architectures, evaluating their safety in synergistic harmful image-text generation tasks becomes a critical challenge. Unlike unimodal threats, synergistic risks emerge when text and image modalities are coordinated to produce harm that significantly...
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications, yet their tendency to generate toxic, harmful, or policy-violating content poses significant risks. Detecting these unsafe outputs efficiently in a black-box manner remains an open challenge. In this paper, we extend a recently proposed...
Mohamed Akrout, O. Kotevska, Dan Wilson· 0 citations
This work proposes SafeMol, a parameter-efficient safety alignment framework that jointly optimizes lightweight modules across text-only and graph-conditioned inputs, uses MMD for distribution-level representation alignment to reduce modality-induced discrepancies, and explicitly models molecular hazardousness and harm...
Xin-Miao Wang, Rui-Jie Wang, Meng-Hui Wang et al.· 0 citations
Experiments show that MMAligner raises the average refusal rate on unsafe multimodal inputs to 99% with less than 2% utility degradation and minimal training data, substantially improving the safety-utility trade-off over existing baselines.
Shenyi Zhang, Keyan Guo, Zihao Wang et al.· 1 citation