Skip to content

LLMs Can't Play Hangman: On the Necessity of a Private Working Memory for Language Agents

Jan 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2601.06973 · 2 citations · 61 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A novel architecture incorporating an explicit private working memory is proposed and it is demonstrated that this mechanism restores consistency with a fixed hidden state, establishing private state as a necessary component for PSIT-capable language agents.

Abstract

As LLMs move from text completion toward autonomous agents, they remain constrained by the standard chat interface, which lacks private working memory. This raises a fundamental question: can agents reliably perform interactive tasks that depend on hidden state? We define Private State Interactive Tasks (PSITs), which require agents to generate and maintain hidden information while producing public responses consistent with a fixed hidden state. We show theoretically that any agent restricted to the public conversation history cannot both keep the secret unresolved in the transcript and respond consistently with a fixed hidden state in PSITs, yielding an architectural impossibility theorem. To empirically validate this limitation, we introduce a self-consistency testing protocol that evaluates whether agents can maintain a hidden secret across forked dialogue branches. Standard chat-based LLMs and retrieval-based memory baselines fail this test regardless of scale, demonstrating that semantic retrieval does not enable true state maintenance. To address this, we propose a novel architecture incorporating an explicit private working memory; we demonstrate that this mechanism restores consistency with a fixed hidden state, establishing private state as a necessary component for PSIT-capable language agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/chandar-lab/Hangman

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Whose Memory Is It? Scope-Aware Commit Rules for Long-Term LLM Memory

Persistent memory allows an LLM agent to carry experience across conversations, but it also turns a local reasoning mistake into a durable one. During deliberation, an agent may consider a plan, simulate a tool result, report another speaker's belief, and then reject all of them. If memory retains only the resulting se...

Hong-Yu Gu, Xin-Chang Li · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Can Agent Memory Systems Track Evolving State?

StateMem is presented, a state-first memory method that explicitly tracks supersession and relational dependencies, and it is shown it improves current-state accuracy over the strongest same-backbone baseline and over the strongest memory system, while remaining competitive with the long-context baselines.

Xin-Yi Fan, Miri Liu, Ruozhen Yang et al. · 5 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Aug 2026

Remember, Verify, or Ask? Cross-Family Evaluation of Memory Commitment in LLM Agents

The memory-clarification boundary is studied: whether interaction-derived information should be persisted, used only in the current context, re-verified, or clarified with the user, as well as across Claude and Qwen.

Bai-Chuan Li, Jun-Yi Yao, Zi-Hao Zheng · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Talking with Language Models

When we interact with large language models (LLMs), are we having a conversation? They are designed to invite us to treat them as intelligent interlocutors who remember, act, and make commitments. But appearances deceive. We introduce the artifactual stance, a framework that reconceives human-AI interaction as artifact...

James Ravi Kirkpatrick, Alexandru Radulescu, R. Sterken · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

S3Gym: Can LLMs Turn Self-Testing and Self-Judging into Self-Improvement?

These findings show that recognizing successful actions is insufficient; agents must also transform feedback into executable and transferable policies, and provide a unified framework for diagnosing this process and identifying the bottlenecks that prevent agents from translating interaction experience into reliable se...

Jia-Jun Shi, Siyang Tao, Yu-Hao Wu et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 24, 2026

Estimating suicide risk from text

A new language-processing tool could help identify the highest-risk individuals from natural language, enabling swifter interventions.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.