Skip to content

MIND: Unified Inquiry and Diagnosis RL with Criteria Grounded Clinical Supports for Psychiatric Consultation

Mar 2026 · 0 citations · 54 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

MIND, a criteria-grounded evidence-state decision interface, introduces MIND, a criteria-grounded evidence-state decision interface that targets screening-level decision support, not autonomous diagnosis.

Abstract

Psychiatric consultation requires agents to elicit discriminative evidence, map uncertain narratives to diagnostic criteria, and decide when evidence suffices. Existing dialogue and retrieval-augmented systems condition policies on raw histories or appended passages, leaving observed evidence, missing checks, differentials, and support reliability entangled. We introduce MIND, a criteria-grounded evidence-state decision interface. At each turn, MIND constructs a typed state containing observed evidence, unresolved criterion checks, active differentials, criterion-linked supports, and reliability metadata. A training-split Psychiatric Reasoning Bank supplies gated supports, turning retrieval into state construction rather than prompt injection. The same state conditions action selection, process rewards, information-gain scoring, and trajectory rectification. Under EMR-grounded simulator protocols, MIND improves accuracy by 8.8 and 7.3 points over strong inference-only, RAG, and RL baselines, with gains transferring to public MDD-5k dialogues. Matched interventions attribute these gains to the shared state rather than prompt length, retrieval text, or formatting. MIND targets screening-level decision support, not autonomous diagnosis. Code is available at https://github.com/Lingxi-mental-health/MIND.{\AA}

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2026

PsyCIDRA: A Dual-Agent Framework for Psychiatric Interviewing and Diagnostic Reasoning

Large language models show promise in clinical reasoning, but psychiatric interviewing requires guiding an evolving conversation. Their ability to carry out this interactive assessment remains less studied. We present PsyCIDRA, a dual-agent framework linking free-form psychiatric interviewing with diagnostic reasoning...

Milad Mohammadi, Fatemeh Akrami Shamsabadi, Zahra Mohseni et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

HiMA-MDD: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Harness for Interpretable Multimodal Depression Detection in Clinical Interviews

HiMA-MDD is introduced, a hierarchical multi-agent harness that aligns this assessment hierarchy with three agent layers and naturally yields a Hierarchical Evidence Trace that preserves all intermediate evidence, judgments, and revisions for auditability.

Aoshi Chen, Xiao-Jiang Peng · 0 citations
Open access 2026

DSM-Guided Large Language Model Reasoning for Depression and PTSD Assessment From Psychiatric Interview Transcripts

Experiments show that DSM-guided summarization and rationale-augmented reasoning substantially improve transcript-based mental health classification performance and indicate that human validation is indispensable when applying LLMs in psychiatry, even though the process is inherently time-consuming.

June-Woo Kim, Haram Yoon, Dawoon Jung et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Source-Grounded Framework for Constructing and Evaluating Progressive Multimodal Diagnostic Dialogues from Clinical Case Reports

This work presents a source-grounded framework to construct progressive multimodal diagnostic dialogues from case reports and an evaluation strategy for assessing MLLMs on final diagnosis, diagnostic reasoning, and image-finding interpretation and demonstrates that fluent responses do not necessarily reflect evidence-g...

Yu-Fan Wang, Rui Yang, Yi Liu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Toward an epistemic grounding of clinical reasoning: artificial intelligence and psychological diagnosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support diagnosis across medicine, yet extending its success to psychological assessment raises a distinct epistemological problem. Psychological diagnosis requires interpreting subjective experience, contextualizing clinical information, and developing explanatory h...

Andrea Primo Pierotti, Marco Cremaschi · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

Evidence-Bounded Mental Health Reasoning from Heterogeneous Speech Protocols

The Evidence Package Benchmark is introduced, integrating 1,870 packages across six heterogeneous sources with explicit modality masks and evidence permissions, and EviBound, a protocol-aware evidence control framework is proposed, a protocol-aware evidence control framework for safer clinical NLP research.

Cheng-Yuan Gao, Jiang Wu, Tao Lu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.