Structural Anchor Pruning: Training-Free Multi-Vector Compression for Visual Document Retrieval
TL;DR
The authors' layer-resolved SR analysis reveals an Alignment-Aggregation Divergence: visual structure is preserved as a stable ``Structural Plateau''within the backbone, while the final layers reshape it into a sparse, query-aligned form unsuitable for pruning.
Abstract
Recent Vision-Language Models (e.g., ColPali) enable fine-grained Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) but incur prohibitive multi-vector index storage overhead. Existing training-free pruning methods either rely on heuristic layer choices or degrade sharply under aggressive compression, leading prior work to argue that effective high-compression pruning requires query-dependent training. We challenge this view with Structural Anchor Pruning (SAP), a self-calibrating, training-free, query-agnostic index-time framework combining (i) Score Retention (SR), a white-box per-layer compression diagnostic; (ii) SR-guided window selection, which automatically locates the structural pruning region of any backbone with no per-model hyperparameters; and (iii) a visual in-degree centrality scorer that identifies anchor patches within that window. On ViDoRe v1/v2 across three architectures spanning 18, 28, and 36 backbone layers, SAP retains 93--96\% of NDCG@5 on v1 and 88--90\% on the harder v2 while pruning 90\% of visual tokens; at 20$\times$ compression it retains 85--90\% and 76--79\% respectively. Our layer-resolved SR analysis reveals an Alignment-Aggregation Divergence: visual structure is preserved as a stable ``Structural Plateau''within the backbone, while the final layers reshape it into a sparse, query-aligned form unsuitable for pruning. Probing the pre-retrieval base backbones shows that contrastive fine-tuning sharpens this boundary three- to eight-fold, explaining why final-layer methods fail.
