EYT-Bench is introduced, a human-centered benchmark whose evaluation protocol is built around a decoupled three-party design: a persona-grounded user simulator, a target model evaluated on both intent perception and response generation, and an independent, configurable ensemble of LLM judges.
Abstract
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) as multi-turn conversational partners requires probing capabilities that single-turn benchmarks miss: persona consistency, evolving intent tracking, emotional dynamics, and goal completion across many turns. We introduce EYT-Bench, a human-centered benchmark whose evaluation protocol is built around a decoupled three-party design: a persona-grounded user simulator, a target model evaluated on both intent perception and response generation, and an independent, configurable ensemble of LLM judges. Across 3,400 dialogues with 17 target models, EYT-Bench reveals four findings that previous benchmarks miss: (i) state-of-the-art closed and open-source models are statistically indistinguishable on subjective dimensions, but separate by up to 9x on objective intent-tracking; (ii) reasoning is a phase transition for objective tracking on long-context personas but is essentially flat on subjective scores; (iii) persona format strongly affects trajectory spread, FICR (final-intent completion rate) saturates above 0.95 on Nemotron-USA but ranges from 0.53 to 0.88 on PersonaMem-v2; and (iv) the warm-up effect is observed in 16 of 17 models.
AnthroDial is presented, a closed-loop framework that formulates anthropomorphic dialogue as a joint problem of system architecture, executable evaluation, and diagnostic alignment and shows that anthropomorphic dialogue benefits when generation, evaluation, and reward shaping share the same behavioral dimensions.
Wentao Liu, Si-Yu Song, Xi Chen et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
PALATE (Person-Aligned LLM-Simulated-User Assessment with Tailored Evaluation with Tailored Evaluation), a scalable RPA benchmark built on user simulators, produces interpretable evaluations of specific user-RPA pairs rather than compressing systems into a single user-independent ranking.
Yuhan Zhu, Ming-Xuan Du, Benfeng Xu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
It is hypothesize that existing benchmarks and user satisfaction are tracking different capabilities: benchmarks measure elicited retrieval (recall when asked), while conversation requires natural integration (detecting relevance and naturally weaving prior context into a response).
Ryuichi Sumida, K. Inoue, Tatsuya Kawahara· 0 citations
FPCO-Dialog is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating correction and cooperation behavior in VLMs under repeated false premises, and reveals substantial and persistent cross-model differences in aggregate correction tendency, model-specific turn-wise dynamics, and systematic variation across false-premise types under t...
Jiayuan Ma, Yu-Qi Lu, Wei-Yang Guo et al.· 0 citations
TurnBench, a multi-domain benchmark that pairs a 30-hour, hand-labeled corpus of dyadic human conversation with a standardized evaluation protocol for end-of-turn and interruption detection, finds end-of-turn recall stable across types, while interruption false positives are strongly type-dependent and concentrated in...
Freeman Jiang, Ramon Sanabria, Soham Deshmukh et al.· 7 citations· ⚡2
The results suggest that maintaining goal alignment in role-playing agents requires explicitly managing the trade-off between conversational responsiveness and goal adherence, and reveal a critical trade-off dependent on model scale.
Dong-Xu Lu, Albert Gatt, Johan Jeuring· SIGDIAL Conferences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.