Aug 2026· International Journal of Technology and Emerging Research· 0 citations· 32 references
TL;DR
The study concludes that the long-term sustainability of GenAI in education depends on balancing technological innovation with environmental transparency and ethical stewardship, advocating for longitudinal research to monitor future cognitive and ecological impacts.
Abstract
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has stimulated a significant transformation in higher education, aligning with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals while simultaneously presenting a "sustainability trade-off." While GenAI offers emerging opportunities for individualized learning, enhanced accessibility, and the development of transferable skills such as critical thinking and creativity. The sustainable integration of GenAI remains challenging because the training and deployment of large language models require energy-intensive computational infrastructure, leading to increased carbon emission and water consumption, while simultaneously introducing ethical challenges such as academic integrity, transparency and algorithmic bias. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizing findings from 32 recent scholarly works published between 2022 and 2026. The review employs the Population–Exposure–Outcome (PEO) framework to examine how GenAI restructures learning environments across dimensions of operational efficiency, pedagogy, and ideology. Key results identify five strategic processes for sustainable implementation: ethical appropriation, infrastructure management, faculty development, curricular transformation, and pedagogical innovation. Furthermore, the review addresses global power dynamics, highlighting a shift toward plurality while cautioning against algorithmic colonialism. We propose the Generative AI-Enabled Sustainable Education (GAISE) framework as a roadmap for institutional resilience. The study concludes that the long-term sustainability of GenAI in education depends on balancing technological innovation with environmental transparency and ethical stewardship, advocating for longitudinal research to monitor future cognitive and ecological impacts
Keywords: education; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Sustainable Development Goals; GenAI
It is shown that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance, and that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance.
Syusinka Rahmatika, Martanto, Ryan Hamonangan· Immortalis Journal of Interd...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI can effectively improve teaching efficacy, enable personalised learning experiences, and streamline assessment procedures, however, its implementation also draws attention to concerns regarding academic integrity, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and ethical governance.
Xi Bi· Exploring Science Academic C...· 0 citations
Sustainable progress in Education 5.0 requires policymakers, educators, and technologists to adopt an integrated approach that treats ethical AI governance and evolving competency development as co-constitutive rather than ancillary concerns.
Felix Tersoo Gbaeren· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOC...· 0 citations
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in educational institutions has occurred without systematic assessment of its environmental impacts. Training and operating large language models result in electricity consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, water use, hardware manufacturing, and electroni...
A conceptual framework offering AI designers, teacher educators, and policymakers a psychologically grounded, empirically mapped, and internationally contextualised basis for developing AI-supported educational systems that advance equity, learner engagement, and meaningful educational transformation is proposed.
Arpana Koul· Review of Artificial Intelli...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.