Skip to content
Review

Diagnostic performance of deep-learning algorithms in radiographic grading of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jul 2026 · Acta Radiologica · Vol 67, pp. 723 - 736 · 0 citations · 64 references
Medicine

TL;DR

DL models showed better diagnostic performance for moderate-to-severe radiographic KOA than for early-stage disease, but poor sensitivity for K–L grade 1, substantial heterogeneity, and limited external validation suggest that current DL models are not yet reliable for early KOA detection or ready for routine clinical implementation.

Abstract

Background Deep learning (DL) has been increasingly applied to grade knee osteoarthritis (KOA) on radiographs, but reported diagnostic performance varies across Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) grades. Purpose To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of DL models for radiographic KOA grading. Material and Methods PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched through November 2024 for studies using DL algorithms to grade KOA on X-ray images. Sensitivity and precision were synthesized. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted according to transfer learning, external validation, multi-task learning, joint training strategy, and data splitting. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. Study quality was evaluated using the revised QUADAS-2 tool. Results Of 1004 records screened, 32 studies were included. Pooled sensitivity for K–L grades 0–4 was 0.90, 0.66, 0.80, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively, and pooled precision was 0.87, 0.71, 0.81, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively. Diagnostic performance was poorest for K–L grade 1, particularly in sensitivity, indicating limited reliability for early-stage KOA detection. Heterogeneity was high across outcomes and grades, particularly for sensitivity in K–L grades 1 and 2 and precision in K–L grades 0 and 1. Meta-regression identified transfer learning and data splitting as potential sources of heterogeneity. Egger's tests suggested no statistically significant small-study effects. Conclusion DL models showed better diagnostic performance for moderate-to-severe radiographic KOA than for early-stage disease. However, the poor sensitivity for K–L grade 1, substantial heterogeneity, and limited external validation suggest that current DL models are not yet reliable for early KOA detection or ready for routine clinical implementation. Further standardized reporting, robust validation, and multicenter external evaluation are required.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Promises and limitations of deep learning for predicting knee osteoarthritis progression from medical imaging: A systematic review.

PURPOSE To systematically evaluate the performance, methodological quality, and translational barriers of deep learning (DL) models for predicting knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression from medical imaging. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (inception to June 2026) fo...

Amna Gillani, R. von Eisenhart-Rothe, K. Woertler et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Deep learning models for osteonecrosis of the femoral head on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance, staging accuracy, and external generalizability.

Deep learning models demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy on MRI for ONFH detection and binary staging, with promising but limited evidence for collapse prediction.

Ozgur Basal, Furkan Karakaş, Burak Serteser et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Noise-robust attention-guided deep learning for automated five-class knee osteoarthritis grading from radiographs

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is commonly assessed using radiographic Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grading; however, manual evaluation is subjective and prone to inter- and intra-observer variability, particularly in early-stage disease. Although deep learning approaches have shown promise, challenges remain in distinguishing ad...

Michael Joseph Shundi, Rajesh Kumar Pullagura, Chiranjeevi Karri · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.