Direct On-Policy Distillation (Direct-OPD) is proposed, which transfers the teacher's RL-induced policy shift instead of running sparse-reward RL on the target model and consistently leverages weaker teachers to improve stronger target models.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training. As models scale, post-training itself becomes a bottleneck. We study a weak-to-strong alternative: run RL on a smaller model where rollouts are cheaper, then reuse what that RL run learned to improve a stronger target model. Directly distilling the post-RL weak teacher is not enough, because the teacher's final policy mixes useful RL gains with the limitations of the smaller model. We propose Direct On-Policy Distillation (Direct-OPD), which transfers the teacher's RL-induced policy shift instead. Direct-OPD compares the post-RL teacher with its own pre-RL reference and treats their log-ratio as a dense implicit reward for the student. In plain terms, the checkpoint pair tells us which actions RL made the weak model more or less likely to take, and Direct-OPD applies that signal on the stronger student's own on-policy states. This directly reuses the weak model's RL supervision signal without running sparse-reward RL on the target model. Empirically, Direct-OPD consistently leverages weaker teachers to improve stronger target models; notably, it boosts Qwen3-1.7B from 48.3% to 58.3% on AIME 2024 in just 4 hours on 8 A100 GPUs. It outperforms step-matched direct RL and enables the sequential composition of multiple policy shifts. Our results show that RL outcomes can be reused across model scales as implicit reward signals, not merely as final models to imitate.
Weak-to-strong generalization asks whether stronger models can learn from weaker supervisors and surpass them. This question is particularly important for successive model generations and multi-domain consolidation, where repeating frontier-scale post-training from scratch can be prohibitively expensive. Yet convention...
Youngrok Park, Sangmin Bae, Hojung Jung et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that the delta signal substantially improves on-policy distillation and the new distillation method is referred to as On-Policy Delta Distillation (OPD), enabling reasoning LLMs to achieve strong performance with only a short post-training period.
It is shown that a simple two-stage scheme, OPD-then-RL, consistently outperforms pure OPD, pure RLVR, and all such joint baselines across logic and math reasoning benchmarks.
Bo-Yang Li, Bingsen Chen, Cheng-Hao Yang et al.· 6 citations
This work reformulates the implicit reward of sampled-token OPD based on trajectory correctness, then applies a ReLU gating mechanism to ensure that correct trajectories receive non-negative rewards and incorrect ones receive non-positive rewards, making it readily combinable with any policy gradient algorithm, such as...
On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense, per-token supervision for language model post-training, but its effectiveness is bottlenecked by teacher quality: external teachers suffer from distribution mismatch, while self-distillation with privileged conditioning is limited by in-context learning capacity. We propose...
Yang Li, Semih Yavuz, Shafiq Joty· 2 citations· ⚡1
This work proposes Reasoning-Progress-Aware Reward Filtering for On-Policy Distillation (R2-OPD), which constructs two within-trajectory rankings of reasoning spans, one from teacher-derived rewards and the other from independently estimated progress reward.
Chen Yang, Hai-Yuan Wan, Rengrong Xiong et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.