A relation-centric exploration paradigm is introduced, which uses relations rather than entities as search units and thus avoids unreliable entity pruning and proposes Compositional Chain-of-Relations (CCoR), a simple and effective framework that grounds both phases in the KG with two relation chains.
Abstract
Knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) is a key task for evaluating KG-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs), and complex KGQA that requires multi-hop reasoning is especially challenging. Solving a complex query involves two coupled phases: candidate retrieval, which locates answer candidates over the KG, and constraint handling, which filters these candidates against the query constraints. Faithful reasoning requires grounding both phases in the KG. However, existing agent-based methods ground candidate retrieval through entity-centric exploration, while leaving constraint handling to the LLM's internal knowledge, which leads to two critical limitations. (1) Unreliable entity pruning: entity-centric exploration uses entities as search units and must prune them to a fixed-size subset at each hop. Because entity information in KGs is often incomplete and a fixed-size subset cannot retain all valid entities, such pruning inevitably drops valid entities and ultimately leads to wrong answers. (2) Ungrounded constraint handling: query constraints are resolved from the LLM's internal knowledge rather than the KG, leaving the final answers unverifiable and prone to hallucination. To address these limitations, this paper introduces a relation-centric exploration paradigm, which uses relations rather than entities as search units and thus avoids unreliable entity pruning. Built on this paradigm, this paper proposes Compositional Chain-of-Relations (CCoR), a simple and effective framework that grounds both phases in the KG with two relation chains: a main chain for candidate retrieval and a constraint chain that verifies query constraints through explicit KG exploration. Experiments on four KGQA benchmarks show that CCoR consistently improves accuracy, faithfulness, and efficiency over strong baselines, with more pronounced gains on complex queries.
Experiments show that precision improves by filtering invalid candidates, while recall is preserved due to retaining candidates whose constraints are not explicitly violated, and a three-valued constraint semantics that avoids incorrect rejections under open-world assumptions.
E. Kitzelmann· Deutsche Jahrestagung für Kü...· 0 citations
Results indicate that integrating multi-source domain knowledge with relation-preserved retrieval and attribute-supported filtering provides more focused and inspectable evidence, thereby supporting more accurate complex material question answering.
Peize Li, Xi Guo, Nan Yin et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
KGCaRe is proposed, a hybrid approach that combines neural retrieval with symbolic reasoning over LLM-generated KGs that consistently outperforms existing baselines, including Vanilla LLM, Code Prompt, Text Prompt, Think-on-Graph, Vanilla RAG, and HybridContextQA.
Ghanshyam Verma, Sima Sarkar, Devishree Pillai et al.· 0 citations
GraphQAG effectively supports users in identifying knowledge coverage gaps, examining generated QA pairs, and refining the QA pair set through graph-based interactions, demonstrating the usefulness of combining knowledge graphs, LLM-based generation, and visual analytics for producing more comprehensive and trustworthy QA pairs from long documents.
Yize Li, Ruiqi Yu, Tianya Pan et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work presents an agentic text-to-SPARQL system that goes one step beyond static tool-using agents: a researcher agent that, after each round of inference on a validation set, proposes and tests changes to its own prompts, rules, and tool-orchestration code.
RA-QGQA is presented, which recasts triple verification as a question-driven, corpus-grounded task, and demonstrates RA-QGQA as an interactive web system in which users import a KG and its source corpus, verify all triples in a single pass, and inspect the passages that justify its verdict.
Si-Yang Liu, Hong Duc Nguyen, Yun-Miao Li et al.· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.