Skip to content

Multi-centre cutting service composition in cloud manufacturing: a hierarchical decision model with guillotine cutting evaluation

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Production Research · 66 references
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms Digital Transformation in Industry

Abstract

In material-intensive Cloud Manufacturing (CMfg), traditional Service Composition and Optimal Selection (SCOS) approaches often treat cutting services as abstract functional units, which may lead to biased cost estimation and infeasible assignments. This study proposes a hierarchical decision-aid model named DiCACE to integrate macroscopic multi-centre assignment and logistics decisions with microscopic guillotine cutting evaluation, simultaneously optimising completion time, total cost, and overall material utilisation. To make this tightly coupled and strongly constrained problem computationally tractable, we develop a decoder-driven evolutionary framework based on an improved NSGA-III. A novel three-stage decoding strategy is introduced to act as a bridge, efficiently translating abstract assignment decisions into physically executable cutting plans while satisfying complex operational constraints. Experimental results from an industrial case study and dynamic simulations support the practical applicability of the framework. The results show that the proposed framework produces more competitive Pareto trade-offs than representative multi-objective algorithms and maintains better system-level coordination in dynamic scenarios compared to a representative deep reinforcement learning method, while generating feasible assignment schemes for large-scale orders within several minutes. The findings further suggest that CMfg platforms should incorporate process-aware pre-evaluation into the allocation stage, upgrading from passive matchmaking to feasibility-assured decision support for cross-enterprise collaboration.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.