Skip to content
Review Open access

Neck Disability, Associated Factors, and Quality of Life Among Physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia

Sep 2026 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 0 citations · 29 references

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Physiotherapy practice involves patient handling, sustained or awkward postures, and repetitive manual techniques. This study estimated Neck Disability Index (NDI)-defined neck disability among physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia, examined its demographic and workplace associations, and compared quality of life across NDI levels. Methods: An online cross-sectional convenience survey (April–May 2024) included physiotherapists with ≥1 year of clinical experience. Disability and quality of life were assessed using the NDI and WHOQOL-BREF. Analyses used five-variable multinomial regression with robust standard errors, an expanded 11-factor mean bias-reduced sensitivity model, and Holm-adjusted comparisons. Results: Of 367 participants, 197 (53.7%; 95% CI, 48.6–58.7%) had NDI-defined disability: 156 (42.5%) mild and 41 (11.2%) moderate-or-worse. In the main model, mild disability was associated with female versus male sex (adjusted relative risk ratio [RRR], 2.49; 95% CI, 1.54–4.03) and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 versus <25 kg/m2 (RRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.26–3.29); moderate-or-worse disability was associated with pooled non-private versus private rehabilitation settings (RRR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.06–9.73) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (RRR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.05–4.84). The expanded model showed similar sex and workplace associations; only these factors were significant in Holm-adjusted joint tests, and the moderate-or-worse BMI estimate was less precise (RRR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.96–4.69). All four WHOQOL-BREF domains showed lower medians at higher NDI levels (all omnibus Holm-adjusted p < 0.001), with the largest difference in physical health (ε2 = 0.199). Conclusions: Neck-related disability was common and co-occurred with poorer physical, psychological, social, and environmental quality of life. Sex and workplace showed the most consistent adjusted associations. These sample-specific findings warrant representative longitudinal research with direct measurement of occupational exposures and do not establish causality.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.