Skip to content
#data science Review Open access

The dementia fear among older adults: a scoping review

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Medicine · Vol 13 · 0 citations · 49 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background Previous studies evaluating dementia fear among older adults showed inconsistent results regarding its prevalence, measurement approaches, and associated factors. We performed a scoping review to systematically map the literature on measurement tools, prevalence levels, associated factors, and intervention strategies. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed from inception to May 2026. Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data using a standardized form. Evidence was synthesized narratively. Results Nineteen studies including over 9,000 participants were included: 11 cross-sectional surveys, 2 RCTs, 2 scale development studies, 1 longitudinal study, 1 experimental study, and 2 qualitative studies. Measurement tools were highly heterogeneous; Eight studies used validated multidimensional scales (FADS, FODS-K, DWAS), two used the validated unidimensional Dementia Worry Scale (DWS), while the remaining nine studies relied on single-item or adapted measures Dementia fear was predominantly mild to moderate, but the distribution of study populations was uneven across severity levels. Female gender and depressive symptoms were the most consistently associated factors, though causal directions remained undetermined. Dementia knowledge was positively associated with dementia fear, suggesting knowledge-based strategies alone may amplify rather than alleviate fear. Intervention evidence was extremely limited; only two small-sample RCTs provided preliminary efficacy data. Conclusions Current evidence from existing studies did not support a unified conceptual framework or standardized measurement approach for dementia fear. Future research should develop cross-culturally validated multidimensional instruments, conduct longitudinal studies, and design large-sample intervention trials for different worry severity subgroups. Systematic Review Registration https://osf.io/r54jk/, identifier [10.17605/OSF.IO/R54JK]

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 30, 2026

From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence

Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.