Skip to content
Open access

Rescue-Breathing Versus Chest Compression-Only Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Non-Cardiac Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Sep 2026 · Resuscitation · pp. 111332 · 0 citations · 27 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Although CO-CPR remains important in bystander CPR, rescue breathing may still have benefit, particularly in pediatric patients and those with cardiac arrest related to drowning or asphyxia, particularly in pediatric patients.

Abstract

Background

The role of rescue-breathing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (RB-CPR) remains controversial following guideline recommendations emphasizing chest compression-only CPR (CO-CPR). This study evaluated the associations of bystander-performed RB-CPR with mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes in Japanese patients with non-cardiac out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

This retrospective nationwide cohort study included patients identified in the All-Japan Utstein Registry with non-cardiac OHCA between 2012 and 2023. Patients with a cardiac etiology or traumatic cause and those in whom resuscitation was not initiated were excluded. The analysis was restricted to patients who received bystander CPR with documented chest compressions and available information on rescue breathing. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance. Prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Among 154,137 patients, 20,124 (13.1%) received RB-CPR and 134,013 (86.9%) received CO-CPR. RB-CPR was associated with modestly lower risks of both 30-day mortality (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99) and 30-day unfavorable neurological outcomes (adjusted RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99). RB-CPR was associated with lower risks of both outcomes in pediatric patients but no clear differences were observed among adult or elderly patients. Associations were strongest for pediatric patients and drowning-related arrests and modest in patients with asphyxia.

Conclusions

Thirty-day mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes were lower after RB-CPR than after CO-CPR for non-cardiac OHCA, particularly in pediatric patients. Although CO-CPR remains important in bystander CPR, rescue breathing may still have benefit, particularly in pediatric patients and those with cardiac arrest related to drowning or asphyxia.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Do Chest Compressions Benefit the Brain Beyond Restoring Circulation? ROSC-Mediated and ROSC-Independent Pathways of Bystander CPR After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background/Objectives: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but whether its neurological benefit operates solely through prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is unresolved. We quantified the mediated and unmediated components. Method...

G. Cho, Youdong Sohn · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Association of Chest Compression Metrics during Pediatric CPR with Intra-Arrest Blood Pressure and Survival Outcomes in the United States: Insights from ICU-RESUS

New potential pediatric CPR targets that were associated with SHD are identified: rate 130-160 CC/min, depths of 23-27 mm for patients <1 year, and CCF >90%.

Heather A. Wolfe, R. W. Morgan, R. Reeder et al. · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Mechanical versus manual bag-valve ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Optimal ventilation delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains uncertain. Current resuscitation guidelines do not recommend mechanical ventilation (MV) over manual bag-valve ventilation (BV). We evaluated the association between MV use during CPR and clinical outcomes in adults wit...

Yu-Qun Chu, En-Hsien Su, Hua Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AACD-CPR) compared with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) in patients experiencing cardiac arrest (CA). We systematically searched 11 database...

Rui-Fang Cui, Xiao-Peng Liu, Xiao-Qing Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Design and rationale of the TANGO2 trial: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of bystander compression-only CPR versus standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

RATIONALE Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before emergency medical services arrival is associated with improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) is simpler to teach and perform, eliminates interruptions in chest compressions for rescue breaths, and has be...

Erik Boberg, G. Merigo, G. Riva et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

In patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness in cardiac arrest in the pre-hospital setting, does the use of pharmacological interventions impact mortality compared to standard care? A systematic review.

Introduction Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness (CPRIC) is the term commonly used to refer to signs of life displayed by patients during resuscitation. This phenomenon presents a challenge, as these signs of life can interfere with resuscitative efforts. International resuscitation guidelines currently...

Nora Prokop, Alan Rice, M. Durham · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.