In controlled synthetic settings, semantically grounded trajectories provide an effective representation for temporal structural reasoning, supporting further investigation of semantic interfaces between event data, structured representations, and temporal learning.
Abstract
High-complexity operational environments require methods that detect and anticipate temporally distributed patterns rather than classify isolated events. This paper introduces TRACTA (Temporal Reasoning and Capability-Trajectory Analysis), a controlled synthetic benchmark for temporal structural reasoning in high-complexity event-driven systems, instantiated through Multi-Domain Operations (MDO)-like scenarios. The benchmark includes three tasks: early_warning, pattern_detection, and run_classification, and compares raw-event neural models, a contract-lite semantic baseline, and a neuro-symbolic configuration operating on semantically grounded trajectories. Results show that raw event-level learning remains informative, but learned temporal modeling over semantic capability and contextual direct-impact trajectories achieves the highest aggregate point estimates, with the largest margins on the temporal tasks. Ablation analysis indicates that capability dynamics, contextual impacts, and temporal structure contribute complementary information. Shortcut diagnostics indicate that the most direct cross-run global-identifier shortcut is controlled in the primary neural input view, while residual shallow signals remain. Overall, the findings support a bounded methodological conclusion: in controlled synthetic settings, semantically grounded trajectories provide an effective representation for temporal structural reasoning, supporting further investigation of semantic interfaces between event data, structured representations, and temporal learning.
SDAR employs a symbolic reasoning engine to guide agentic decision making, connecting low-level visual cues with structured symbolic representations of events, and enables interpretable reasoning chains that capture causal relationships, contextual dependencies, and event categories.
Guangyao Chen, Liqin Luo, Jun Peng et al.· Visual Intelligence· 0 citations
LiFTER turns future-link forecasting into a verifiable grounded computation and achieves competitive historical-negative forecasting and the highest macro explanation ac- curacy and deletion fidelity across four CTDG benchmarks.
This research proposes an Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Framework that decouples semantic interpretation from geometric verification and establishes a scalable foundation for autonomous compliance, demonstrating that AI reliability in engineering significantly improves when probabilistic models orchestrate deterministic tools...
N. Mirhosseini, D. Shojaei, Soheil Sabri· Buildings· 0 citations
Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces (CART) is proposed, a neuro-symbolic framework that trains MLLMs to interleave natural language reasoning steps with symbolic constraint assertions: lightweight, machine-checkable statements about visual content.
A neuro-symbolic framework that combines learned VLA control with explicit task graphs and multimodal procedural memory is investigated, which positions structured symbolic reasoning and demonstration-derived visual guidance as complementary mechanisms for reliable long-horizon VLA manipulation.
Vivek Chavan, Ya-Huan Shi, O. Heimann et al.· 0 citations
A neuro-symbolic framework that cleanly decouples reasoning into two formal dimensions: Symbolic Validity and Semantic Groundedness is proposed, which significantly improves reasoning reliability without the sprawling heuristics of prior frameworks.
Yu-Xin Zi, Cong Xu, Suparna Bhattacharya et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.