Skip to content

Cognitive Dual-Process Planning for Autonomous Driving with Structured Scene Knowledge and Verifiable Reasoning-Action Consistency

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.19194 · 0 citations · 52 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A cognitive dual-process planning framework that represents planning-relevant scene knowledge in a machine-parsable structured chain-of-thought (S-CoT) schema and shows how explicit scene knowledge can be operationalized through adaptive reasoning and rule-based verification to support high-level VLM planning decisions.

Abstract

High-level planning for autonomous driving is a knowledge-intensive engineering decision task that requires accurate scene understanding, timely inference, and internally consistent action selection. Vision-language models (VLMs) can make intermediate reasoning explicit, but their use in deployed planners is constrained by costly structured supervision, unnecessary reasoning in routine scenes, and possible inconsistencies between generated rationales and driving actions. We present a cognitive dual-process planning framework that represents planning-relevant scene knowledge in a machine-parsable structured chain-of-thought (S-CoT) schema. An automated data engine integrates perception foundation models, critical-path filtering, and an expert VLM to generate S-CoT supervision without manual annotation of individual rationales. A lightweight visual Arbiter estimates scene complexity from multilevel vision-encoder features before language decoding and routes each input to either fast meta-action prediction or slow structured reasoning. For slow-path outputs, a deterministic rule-based validator checks whether the parsed S-CoT fields are consistent with the final meta-action and provides verifiable rewards for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). In a 195-scene manual audit, the generated annotations achieve 91.8\% CoT accuracy and a 98.5\% Logical Consistency Score (LCS). On 574 manually verified NAVSIM test samples, the planner achieves 80.14\% planning accuracy and 97.20\% LCS while reducing average latency by 17.39\% relative to applying slow reasoning to every scene. Evaluation on external long-tail subsets further identifies conditions under which routing and planning performance degrade. Together, these results show how explicit scene knowledge can be operationalized through adaptive reasoning and rule-based verification to support high-level VLM planning decisions.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Neuro-Symbolic Procedural Reasoning for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Manipulation

Vision-language-action (VLA) models can execute short manipulation skills, but remain brittle in long-horizon procedures requiring persistent task state, dependency-aware reasoning, conditional decisions, and reliable grounding. We investigate a neuro-symbolic framework that combines learned VLA control with explicit t...

Vivek Chavan, Ya-Huan Shi, O. Heimann et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Evidence-Gated Task and Motion Planning with Vision-Language Models

Evidence Acquisition and Feasibility Gating (EAFG) is proposed, a framework that acquires visual evidence through VLM-generated exploratory subgoals and TAMP-based execution and applies a feasibility gate to decide whether to proceed with task planning, acquire further evidence, or halt.

Tsunehiko Tanaka, Matthew Stephenson, Alistair Macvicar et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

A Brain-inspired Hierarchical Framework for Zero-Shot Robot Task Reasoning and Execution

Robots that follow open-ended language instructions need to connect semantic intent to visual scene understanding, geometric feasibility, object states, and physical interaction conditions. End-to-end Vision-Language-Action policies have improved cross-task generalization, but they typically map visual and language inp...

Guang-Ming Wang, Peng-Fei Ye, Qi-Zhen Ying et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

FactorDrive: Adaptive Multi-Step Reasoning Driven by Planning-Critical Factors for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced scene understanding and enabled explicit reasoning in end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing methods insufficiently integrate spatial-physical evidence into planning reasoning, while reasoning adaptation remains coarse-grained and falls short of scene-specific plann...

Guolei Huang, Tengfei She, Yuxuan Lu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Large Language Model-Driven Symbolic Planning for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation Tasks

VLA-SP (Vision-Language-Action via Symbolic Planning), a two-stage Embodied Vision-Language-Action framework, enabling fully automated robotic execution from speech and vision inputs is proposed, demonstrating the strong interpretability, executability, and cross-platform applicability of the framework.

Han-Zhuo Zhang, Jiahao Xu, Yi-Chen Xu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

G0.5: One Autoregressive Stream for Robot Reasoning and Action

G0.5 is introduced, a pretrained autoregressive VLA in which a single transformer decoder emits reasoning and action tokens under a single objective, which exceeds state-of-the-art models across 7 independent regimes.

Yicheng Liu, Zibin Dong, Baijun Ye et al. · 14 citations · ⚡2

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.