Skip to content

When Goals Leak Across Relationships: How Cached Goal Representations Shape Cross-Client Decisions

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 23 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The results show that client-specific goal representations persist in the KV cache and can causally influence decisions made for other clients, highlighting the importance of relationship-specific state isolation in persistent LLM agents.

Abstract

As LLM agents take on more autonomous roles, they may interact with multiple clients and counterparties whose goals and incentives conflict. If an agent maintains shared inference state across these interactions, information associated with one relationship may influence decisions made for another. We test OLMo-3-7B-Instruct in a controlled two-client environment with 20 market scenarios, where each client is assigned an opposing objective. With shared conversational memory, the model deviates from the current client's objective in 22% of eligible decisions. We then investigate how these goals are represented in the KV cache. Linear probes show that client-goal ownership becomes highly recoverable in middle layers and is concentrated in particular attention heads. We use these results to identify where to intervene in the cache and test whether these representations affect the model's decisions. Ablating the competitor's cached goal representations at these locations shifts the model toward the current client. The effect is larger for heads identified by probing than for randomly selected heads, and larger when ablating goal tokens than matched non-goal tokens from the same client. Our results show that client-specific goal representations persist in the KV cache and can causally influence decisions made for other clients, highlighting the importance of relationship-specific state isolation in persistent LLM agents.

View source

Similar papers

When LLM Agents Fail to Read the Room: ReAdapt for Relational Social Reasoning

ReAdapt is proposed, which augments the ReAct loop with an explicit structured social state z = (G, B, R, N, D) capturing goal, belief, relationship, norm, and disclosure, and which helps LLM agents turn retrieved social evidence into revised decisions.

Jian-Zhe Lin, Xiao-Lin Li, Yu Liu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Nov 2026

Decision Context: Persistent Behavioral Learning for AI Agents

LLM agents do not learn from corrections across sessions. A user fixes the same mistake at the start of every conversation. Existing agent memory systems primarily handle facts, such as preferences, entities, and conversational history, rather than procedural knowledge. We present Forge Decision Context (forge_dc), a s...

Nima Vahdat, Pashootan Vaezipoor · 0 citations
#human-computer interacti... Preprint Nov 2026

From Benchmarks to Behaviors: A Framework for Auditing AI Agents

Generative AI systems increasingly mediate access to information. Their behavior depends on tools, instructions, and user memories that are often difficult for researchers to observe or control. Here, I introduce TRACE (Transparent Research on Agent Contexts and Environments), a framework for systematically auditing ho...

Nick Hagar · 0 citations

CAVEAT: Towards Robust Computer-Use Agents in Incentive-Misaligned Environments

CAVEAT-Harness is developed, which targets failures and raises the optimal purchase rate by up to 80.0 percentage points, and targeted post-training further improves a smaller open model, to establish incentive robustness as a distinct challenge for delegated agents and diagnose failure modes.

Yuxuan Li, Will Epperson, W. Deng et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

What Did the Agent Actually Do? Evidence-Grounded Oversight for Long-Horizon Agents

As agents take on long-horizon tasks, users shift from making individual decisions to overseeing autonomous execution. Yet the volume of agent activity and the fragmentation of supporting evidence make it difficult to determine which decisions warrant user verification. We study monitors that identify consequential dec...

Zhong-Xiang Sun, Jia-Hao Yan, Hong-Kang Zhao et al. · 0 citations
#human-computer interacti... Preprint Nov 2026

A Life of Its Own: How Agentic AI Companions Are Configured, Experienced as Autonomous Others, and Held Accountable

AI companions increasingly combine persistent memory, background processing, scheduled wake-ups, proactive messaging, and tools. We call these systems agentic AI companions. Decisions about what they record while users are away or whether refusals constrain future contact are embedded in code, prompts, and defaults, of...

Zi-Yue Feng, Qing Xiao, Hong Shen · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Nov 10, 2026

Decision Models in Hugging Face

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.