This paper introduces a distance measure that assesses the output of material generative models by capturing both quality and novelty in a single distribution-based evaluation framework, and introduces the Coarse-Fine Transport Distance (CFTD), which is used as guidance for a material generative model.
Abstract
Generative machine learning is increasingly used for inorganic crystal structure generation. Most models and the corresponding evaluation approaches rely on simple forms of crystal structure representation. In this paper, we showcase the power of atom-averaged features from pretrained Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs), such as MACE, for such tasks. We first introduce a distance measure that assesses the output of material generative models by capturing both quality and novelty in a single distribution-based evaluation framework. In particular, we introduce the Coarse-Fine Transport Distance (CFTD) using two different featurizers, where the quality component is based on coarse MACE features. We showcase CFTD's versatility in capturing crystal-structure quality while also detecting memorization, and compare it with the recently introduced continuous SUN metrics. We further show that coarse MACE features can be used as guidance for a material generative model.
Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much first-principles data are required to convert universal models into ab initio-accurate material-specific potentials, and ask whether fine-tuning is necessarily preferable to training from scratch. We compare five universal MLIP frameworks, MACE-MP-0, SevenNet-0, GRACE-1L-OAM, MatterSim-v1-5M and ORB-v2, across seven chemically diverse systems incorporating rare and reactive events. Fine-tuning on only 10 AIMD-derived configurations is insufficient for the investigated systems; 200 configurations succeed in favorable cases, but the outcome remains strongly system-dependent. By contrast, 2000 AIMD configurations constitute a robust default, yielding low force and energy errors and reproducing the target material-specific observables. Moderately dense sub-sampling of the AIMD trajectory reduces the required trajectory length tenfold with little loss in model quality. Training from scratch on the same datasets is competitive with, and often slightly more accurate than, naive fine-tuning for MACE and SevenNet, whereas GRACE requires more data. The energy profile for a sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS$_2$ reveals that low trajectory-level errors do not guarantee a correct reaction profile, highlighting the need for observable-level validation. Finally, we show that averaging independently trained models improves predictions in scarce-data regimes at no additional first-principles cost. Together, these results provide practical guidelines for converting limited AIMD reference data into reliable material-specific MLIPs for nanosecond-timescale simulations at near-DFT accuracy.
Pre-trained or'foundational'machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are now widely used in materials modelling. However, early pre-trained models and benchmarks have largely focused on ordered, crystalline structures, and their transferability to non-crystalline solids remains unclear. Here, we show that the amorphous state is indeed a central challenge for future universal MLIPs, based on a systematic evaluation of current mainstream models in this domain. We introduce a benchmarking framework built on a curated reference dataset of canonical amorphous systems, as well as validation for structures and properties. Our study identifies limitations in the transferability of many current pre-trained models and investigates fine-tuning strategies tailored to disordered phases. Together, our results can facilitate future applications of MLIPs in the fast-growing field of amorphous functional materials, and they provide guidance for designing next-generation training datasets and transferable atomistic models.
Natascia L. Fragapane, Volker L. Deringer· 2 citations
This work proposes an operator-centric framework in which the external (nuclear) potential, expressed in an AO basis, serves as the model input and builds hierarchical, body-ordered representations of atomic configurations that closely mirror the principles underlying several popular atom-centered descriptors.
Jigyasa Nigam, T. Smidt, G. Dusson· Journal of Chemical Physics· 2 citations
Foundation machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) enable atomistic simulations at substantially lower computational cost than first-principles methods, but their reliability across structural geometries remains insufficiently understood. Here, we construct a density-functional-theory dataset of ZrO2 configurations spanning bulk, slab, particle, neck, and atomically thin wire environments motivated by an experimentally observed ZrO2 desintering process involving neck thinning and atomic wire formation. We first benchmark 26 pretrained MLIPs and observe pronounced geometry-dependent degradation in zero-shot predictions. Without any training, after only reference-energy alignment, the best zero-shot model (ORB-V3) reaches energy and force root-mean-square errors of 6 meV/atom and 197.3 meV/{\AA}, respectively, with the largest force errors in neck and wire configurations. We then compare zero-shot inference, fine-tuning, and training from scratch strategies. Fine-tuning yields lower energy and force errors than training from scratch, while both require comparable wall-clock time. Geometry-specific fine-tuning improves in-domain accuracy but frequently produces negative transfer to other structural classes, whereas mixed-geometry fine-tuning reduces cross-geometry errors. Evaluations of elastic and vibrational properties, surface energies, and neck dynamics further show that rankings based on average energy and force errors do not universally predict property-level behavior. These results demonstrate that geometry-diverse target data and independent physical validations are necessary when adapting foundation MLIPs to low-coordination (ionic) nanostructures.
P. Zanineli, B. Focassio, G. R. Schleder· 0 citations
The limits of equivariant MLIPs are examined, and a family of foundation potentials in the NequIP and Allegro equivariant MLIP architectures are presented which achieve leading inference speeds and strong scalability as well as excellent accuracies across a range of community benchmarks.
Seán R. Kavanagh, Chuin Wei Tan, Menghang Wang et al.· 0 citations
Rem3Di is introduced, a representation-learning framework that repurposes latent features from atomistic foundation models as transferable molecular descriptors for property prediction and virtual screening and provides a route from simulation-trained atomistic representations to transferable, chirality-aware molecular representations for chemical machine learning.
Steffen Wedig, Felix Burton, Rokas Elijošius et al.· 0 citations