The Wadas Case in the Perspective of Political Criminal Law

Abstract

The conflict in Wadas Village, Central Java, emerged from the government’s plan to extract andesite stone to support the construction of the Bener Dam, which triggered opposition from local residents due to concerns over environmental degradation, loss of agricultural land, and disruption of social life. This issue is significant because it reflects a clash between development interests and the protection of human rights, as well as alleged abuse of state power. This study aims to analyze the Wadas case from the perspective of political criminal law and to assess the form of legal protection afforded to citizens. The research employs a normative juridical method with a case study and library research approach, using statutory regulations, concepts of political criminal law, and secondary data derived from legal literature and documented accounts of the Wadas case. The findings indicate that the handling of the Wadas case reflects repressive state actions, including arbitrary arrests, intimidation, violence by security forces, and the exclusion of community participation in the decision-making process. These actions demonstrate characteristics of crimes committed by those in power and are contrary to the principles of the rule of law and the protection of human rights. This study concludes that the Wadas case constitutes a serious violation of citizens’ rights within the framework of political criminal law. Therefore, stronger state accountability, greater respect for public participation, and enhanced human rights protection are required in the implementation of development policies.