Jan 2026· Journal of Nursing Management· Vol 2026· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The proposed HBM‐based Occupational Exposure Risk Perception Scale (HBM‐OERPS) showed initial validity evidence and good internal consistency for assessing nurses′ perceptions of occupational hazards within an HBM framework.
Abstract
Background Nursing staff frequently encounter serious occupational exposure risks that may adversely affect both their physical well‐being and mental health. Their awareness of these risks plays a pivotal role in shaping protective behaviors and influencing how they recognize and respond to workplace hazards. However, existing assessment tools have several limitations, including a lack of robust theoretical foundation and an inability to reflect the complexity of contemporary clinical environments. Methods This multiphase study developed and validated a scale based on the Health Belief Model (HBM). The process included a structured literature review for item generation, a two‐round Delphi consultation, a pilot survey (400 nurses) with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and a cross‐sectional validation sample (1250 nurses) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the Spearman–Brown split‐half coefficient. Results The final scale comprised 32 items organized into five theoretically grounded dimensions: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self‐efficacy. The results of EFA and CFA supported the proposed five‐factor model. Fit indices suggested an acceptable model fit: chi‐square/df = 2.941; RMSEA = 0.039; CFI = 0.974; NFI = 0.961; IFI = 0.974. The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.927. The total Spearman–Brown split‐half coefficient was 0.659, and dimension‐level coefficients ranged from 0.832 to 0.937. Conclusion The proposed HBM‐based Occupational Exposure Risk Perception Scale (HBM‐OERPS) showed initial validity evidence and good internal consistency for assessing nurses′ perceptions of occupational hazards within an HBM framework. Nursing Implications The HBM‐OERPS provides an effective tool for future assessment of occupational exposure risk beliefs among nursing staff. This approach assists in identifying domain‐specific risk‐belief deficits and guides the design of targeted occupational safety education, resource allocation, and management strategies.
Low participation in early breast cancer detection remains a public health concern in Indonesia. This study contextually modified a Health Belief Model (HBM)-based instrument assessing Indonesian women’s beliefs about breast cancer and breast self-examination (BSE). Behavioral indicators were derived from open-ended re...
The Seven-Time Dimensions Scale (STDS) assesses daily life rhythms and perceived psychosocial resources, addressing the limitations of traditional symptom-focused tools and meeting the need for a comprehensive assessment for mental-health-related factors. However, as this scale has not been validated in Chinese nurses,...
Jing-Xi Xu, Hong Luo, Xiang Li et al.· BMC Nursing· 0 citations
Introduction Positive mental health is a relevant protective construct for nursing professionals, who are frequently exposed to high emotional and occupational demands. However, brief and psychometrically sound instruments for assessing positive mental health in Peruvian nursing personnel remain limited. Objectives To...
Jeseth Paloma Valerio Vega, Shayelli Marialid Hurtado Chanducas, Ysmael Uriel Lanza Mamani et al.· SAGE Open Nursing· 0 citations
The AI-BRPS has demonstrated satisfactory initial psychometric properties and shows promise for assessing healthcare professionals' benefit expectations and risk concerns regarding medical AI in similar settings, with potential applications in pre-implementation assessment and future evaluation of intervention outcomes...
Hao-Ning Shi, Yue Xiang, Xi-Lin Yang et al.· International Journal of Med...· 0 citations
The draft nursing empowerment scale (NES) demonstrates good psychometric properties as a comprehensive, multidimensional research instrument and enables the simultaneous, multidimensional measurement of structural, psychological, and behavioral empowerment within a single instrument.