Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) map baseline characteristics to treatment recommendations, with the optimal ITR maximizing expected reward or policy welfare. Indirect methods may require restrictive modeling assumptions, whereas direct methods can be sensitive to nuisance estimation error and limited overlap. We propose orthogonal double residual learning (ODRL), a two-stage, cross-fitted framework that directly targets the optimal ITR through cost-sensitive classification using the product of treatment and outcome residuals. To our knowledge, ODRL is the first direct method with a universally Neyman orthogonal objective requiring neither restrictive modeling assumptions nor inverse propensity score weighting. Thus, nuisance estimation errors affect regret through a second-order product, and ODRL remains robust under limited overlap. The Fisher consistent objective accommodates general decision rule sieves. We establish nonasymptotic high probability value function regret bounds relative to the Bayes classifier for VC classes, including linear rules and decision trees, and calibrated regret bounds for surrogate relaxations using support vector machines and deep ReLU neural networks. We further show that generic surrogate relaxations need not preserve orthogonality, whereas bounded score hinge learning does. Simulations demonstrate strong performance across complex and linear decision boundaries, limited overlap, and working model misspecification. Applications to the Right Heart Catheterization study and the Oxford Net Zero experiment illustrate interpretable treatment or policy recommendations. The \texttt{odrlITR} R package implements ODRL.
We develop a partial identification learning framework for individualized treatment rules (ITRs) with categorical treatments, outcomes, and instrumental variables. Rather than relying on strong causal assumptions required for point identification, our framework leverages causal bounds to characterize the optimal treatm...
Johannes Hruza, Paweł Morzywołek, Jakob Zeitler et al.· 0 citations
There is an increasing call for individualized treatment rules, which leverage individual patient characteristics to recommend treatments or interventions, tailoring recommendations based on their covariates. This is particularly of interest for the care of conditions such as depression, for which many treatment option...
N. Galanter, S. Shortreed, Erica E. M. Moodie· Psychological methods· 0 citations
In marketing, optimizing subsidy allocation to maximize overall profits is of substantial economic importance. Prior research has employed treatment effect estimation techniques to identify subsidy-sensitive items and design corresponding allocation strategies. However, more accurate treatment effect estimations do not...
Xiang Li, Yanghao Xiao, Chun-Yuan Zheng et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 2 citations
PruneShift, an evaluation framework that separates broad predictive fidelity, fidelity near selector outputs, and the quality of the selected pruning decision, is introduced, showing why predictive fit, decision reliability, and pruning method quality require separate evidence.
This work derives a finite-dimensional dual formulation of PrO inference that separates sampling fluctuation, approximation under a divergence budget, regularization, and numerical optimization error and uses an exactly solvable categorical example to show that predictive-risk convergence can imply convergence to a uni...
Aurya Javeed, D. Kouri, Teresa Portone et al.· 0 citations
Finding the optimal individualized treatment rule that maps individual characteristics or contextual information to treatment assignments has been extensively investigated in existing literature, with widespread practical applications. This paper considers the estimation of optimal treatment regimes within a semi-super...
Mengjiao Peng, Yong Zhou, Wenbin Lu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.