This work proposes an always-on attention-coordination layer that mediates this interface and allocates human attention across one or more working agents, and introduces JarvisBench to evaluate both directions of this coordination.
Abstract
Long-horizon agents can execute continuously, but human attention remains intermittent and scarce. This creates a bidirectional coordination problem: users may need immediate access to an agent while work continues in the background, whereas agents may encounter consequential decisions that require user judgment after the user has stopped monitoring execution. We posit an always-on attention-coordination layer---\textit{Jarvis}\footnote{Named after the fictional AI assistant in \textit{Iron Man}.}---that mediates this interface and allocates human attention across one or more working agents. We introduce \textit{JarvisBench} to evaluate both directions of this coordination: whether an intermediary can accurately and promptly answer user-initiated questions about ongoing work, and whether it can recognize when an agent requires user judgment, solicit that judgment at the right moment, and route it back to improve task outcomes. JarvisBench contains 45 agentic task instances: 20 single-agent tasks and 25 workstreams organized into 10 multi-agent projects. The tasks span 19 domains and were selected and adapted from more than 2,000 public candidates. Crucially, the need for user attention arises naturally during execution rather than from an obvious omission in the initial prompt. JarvisBench is designed to integrate with arbitrary agent runtimes without modifying their underlying execution loops. Our reference implementation further provides a full-duplex speech interface, allowing users to reach Jarvis naturally while timely attention coordination supports agents working in the background. By separating agent execution from attention coordination, JarvisBench provides a stable evaluation target as agent capabilities continue to improve.
JarvisBench, a benchmark for measuring the dual value of mediation in long-horizon agent workflows, is introduced and preliminary results suggest that Jarvis-style mediation can provide trace-grounded responses to user questions and improve task performance when sparse user guidance is injected at appropriate moments.
This primer draws on fieldwork in a computational biology laboratory to examine what human oversight of AI agents requires in practice and shows that effective oversight has four components: adequate knowledge of system capabilities and limitations, sufficient observation of system actions, meaningful control of system behavior, and timely intervention in system failures.
This work introduces VibeLifeBench, a benchmark of 200 long-horizon tasks across ten everyday-life domains, and evaluates seven frontier models, all of which score low, which shows how far current agents are from assisting with real life.
AgentRadio is presented, an asynchronous message-passing layer that equips coding-agent harnesses with three primitives: threads, messages, and waiting for mentions that shows the gain growing with task difficulty, consistent with mid-course correction as the underlying mechanism.
Xinxing Ren, Qianbo Zang, Ziyan Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Results show that parallel execution can improve both success rate and efficiency on decomposable, long-horizon GUI tasks, pointing to a direction worth further study.
This work proposes Agentic Context Management (ACM), a framework that equips agents with purpose-built context editing tools for lossless context management and develops a post-training pipeline that constructs high-quality demonstrations of context management and improves model performance on both agentic search and coding tasks.
Xiao-Chuan Li, Ryan Ming, Meng Chu et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.