Skip to content

ALF: Open-Source Active Learning Framework for Atomistic Modeling

Aug 2026 · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 0 citations · 76 references

TL;DR

The Active Learning Framework (ALF), an open-source Python package designed to streamline the design and deployment of MLIP training datasets on High Performance Computing resources, is introduced, illustrating ALF’s effectiveness in compiling datasets that capture essential chemical and structural regimes.

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have surged in popularity over the last two decades, with many model architectures now openly available. As data-driven models, MLIPs critically depend on high-fidelity (i.e., physically accurate) training data produced by electronic structure calculations. However, assembling large and chemically diverse datasets can be a complex and time-consuming endeavor, often requiring the manual selection of representative atomic configurations and the execution of hundreds to millions of electronic structure simulations. To address this challenge, we introduce the Active Learning Framework (ALF), an open-source Python package designed to streamline the design and deployment of MLIP training datasets on High Performance Computing resources. ALF automatically selects new configurations from undersampled regions of the potential energy surface where the MLIP exhibits high uncertainty, schedules electronic structure calculations across available computational resources, and retrains MLIPs on the fly, thereby reducing manual intervention and limiting human bias. As a demonstration, we applied ALF to generate an actively learned dataset for molten salt mixtures consisting of F, Li, Na, Be, and K atoms. An MLIP trained on this data was then employed to predict melting point, viscosity, density, radial distribution function, and specific heat, which are computationally resource-intensive to evaluate via first-principles molecular dynamics. These results were subsequently validated against experimental data. Collectively, these findings illustrate ALF’s effectiveness in compiling datasets that capture essential chemical and structural regimes, thereby virtually eliminating manual curation.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

MLIP Studio: An Open Platform for Interactive Benchmarking and Atomistic Simulations Using Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

This work introduces MLIP Studio, an open and free platform that brings more than 60 universal MLIPs into a unified interactive interface for molecules and materials, and demonstrates that MLIP-based pre-optimization can reduce subsequent DFT optimization effort by ~33$\times$.

Manas Sharma, Sudeep N. Punnathanam, A. Rajan · 1 citation
Preprint Jul 2026

AI2Pot: A scalable and unified framework for machine-learning interatomic potential development and large-scale molecular dynamic simulations

Machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) bridge the accuracy of first-principles calculations and the efficiency required for large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. However, existing MLIP software remains fragmented across different model architectures, making it difficult to establish unified workflows that support flexible model development, efficient training, and scalable MD deployment. Here, we present AI2Pot, a scalable and unified MLIP framework that seamlessly integrates model training, evaluation, and large-scale MD simulations with PyTorch-compatible ecosystem. Instead of relying on generic automatic differentiation for expensive atomistic operators, AI2Pot re-engineers the core computations of Moment tensor potential (MTP) and Neuroevolution potential (NEP) for both training and inference using hand-crafted C++/CUDA code. These specialized operators constitute a unified computational backend shared by training and inference, improving training-inference consistency and reducing memory usage by avoiding large intermediate caches. As a result, AI2Pot enables fast inference for large-scale atomic systems containing millions of atoms on a single GPU, while retaining the flexibility of PyTorch for model construction, training, and evaluation. Trained models can be deployed in ASE and LAMMPS for MD simulations. Furthermore, AI2Pot provides a companion command-line toolkit (AI2Pot-cli) and Python APIs to facilitate practical MLIP workflows. By unifying high-performance atomistic computing with modern machine-learning ecosystems, AI2Pot offers an user-friendly end-to-end framework for the developing, training, and deploying MLIPs for large scale MD.

Hanyu Liu, Linggang Zhu, Xuanguang Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Fast and Accurate Foundation Models for Equivariant Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials

The limits of equivariant MLIPs are examined, and a family of foundation potentials in the NequIP and Allegro equivariant MLIP architectures are presented which achieve leading inference speeds and strong scalability as well as excellent accuracies across a range of community benchmarks.

Seán R. Kavanagh, Chuin Wei Tan, Menghang Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Data-Efficient Construction of Material-Specific Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Trajectories

Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much first-principles data are required to convert universal models into ab initio-accurate material-specific potentials, and ask whether fine-tuning is necessarily preferable to training from scratch. We compare five universal MLIP frameworks, MACE-MP-0, SevenNet-0, GRACE-1L-OAM, MatterSim-v1-5M and ORB-v2, across seven chemically diverse systems incorporating rare and reactive events. Fine-tuning on only 10 AIMD-derived configurations is insufficient for the investigated systems; 200 configurations succeed in favorable cases, but the outcome remains strongly system-dependent. By contrast, 2000 AIMD configurations constitute a robust default, yielding low force and energy errors and reproducing the target material-specific observables. Moderately dense sub-sampling of the AIMD trajectory reduces the required trajectory length tenfold with little loss in model quality. Training from scratch on the same datasets is competitive with, and often slightly more accurate than, naive fine-tuning for MACE and SevenNet, whereas GRACE requires more data. The energy profile for a sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS$_2$ reveals that low trajectory-level errors do not guarantee a correct reaction profile, highlighting the need for observable-level validation. Finally, we show that averaging independently trained models improves predictions in scarce-data regimes at no additional first-principles cost. Together, these results provide practical guidelines for converting limited AIMD reference data into reliable material-specific MLIPs for nanosecond-timescale simulations at near-DFT accuracy.

Jonas Hänseroth, Christian Dreßler · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Extracting Atomic Environments for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

A notably simple procedure, a method the authors refer to as deletions, yields superior performance over an array of alternative extraction methods for extracting atomic environments from large, bulk configurations and embedding them into smaller configurations suitable for DFT calculations with periodic boundary conditions.

Jared Stimac, Fei Zhou, Kyle Bushick et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Correcting DFT formation energies towards experimental accuracy using foundational MLIPs and latent-feature delta-learning

This work demonstrates how recent foundational machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) trained at the r$^2$SCAN level can be leveraged to improve the agreement of formation energies with experiment, reducing the mean absolute error by more than 40% relative to GGA without requiring any additional DFT calculation.

Timo Reents, Marnik Bercx, Giovanni Pizzi · 0 citations