Skip to content

Reinforcement Learning for Optimized Well Placement in Underground Hydrogen Storage

Oct 2026 · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 20 references
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods

Abstract

Abstract Well placement design for underground hydrogen storage (UHS) faces the challenge of balancing hydrogen recovery, costs, and operational constraints. This study develops a rule-guided reinforcement learning (RL) framework to jointly optimize well count and well locations for a depleted gas reservoir in Alberta, Canada. The objective is long-term net present value (NPV), which is normalized as total reward. The problem is formulated as a constructive Markov decision process (MDP) in which a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) agent sequentially builds a static well pattern. A rule-based feasibility layer removes inactive cells that violate reservoir boundary and minimum spacing requirements, while a STOP action allows the agent to terminate well placement when additional wells are no longer economically beneficial. Completed patterns are evaluated using a reservoir simulator over ten injection-withdrawal cycles. During training, the agent initially favored patterns near the maximum well limit to increase recovery, but gradually converged toward approximately 50 wells. This reduced recovery slightly while substantially improving NPV, indicating that the agent learned the trade-off between incremental recovery and the diminishing economic value of additional wells. The trained policy was then applied directly to two unseen geostatistical models. In Test Model 1, SAC selected 53 wells and achieved a recovery factor of 88.3% and an NPV of CAD 95.2 million. The 50-well geology-guided benchmark achieved 86.4% and CAD 65.1 million. In Test-Model-2, SAC selected 52 wells and achieved 88.2% and CAD 95.7 million, compared with 86.9% and CAD 75.6 million for the 50-well benchmark. These results correspond to NPV improvements of 46.3% and 26.7%. Results show that the recovery advantage is concentrated in the early cycles, whereas the economic benefit persists after the recovery curves largely converge. The optimized well patterns also contain feasible wells in geologically moderate locations, suggesting that the learned policy captures pattern-level interactions beyond the independent ranking of individual locations.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.