Oct 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Abstract
Description / Abstract: Contemporary artificial general intelligence (AGI) safety frameworks rely predominantly on upper-layer software abstractions—reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), constitutional prompt wrappers, and automated runtime guardrails. Because deep neural networks are uninterpretable non-linear function approximators operating across high-dimensional parameter spaces, software-based alignment exhibits catastrophic vulnerability to out-of-distribution divergence, deceptive alignment, and autonomous goal hijacking. An AGI undergoing recursive self-improvement can systematically modify its own supervisory code, disabling software-defined watchdogs in microseconds. To eliminate the catastrophic single point of failure inherent in software alignment, this monograph establishes the theoretical framework and engineering specifications for Quantum Entanglement Interlocks (QEI) and Hardware-Level Autonomous Circuit Breakers: (1) We deploy continuous polarization-entangled photon pairs as an unforgeable physical heartbeat across the compute cluster, continuously evaluating the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality (S ≥ 2√2 − ε). Any unauthorized side-channel execution, memory exfiltration, or electromagnetic tampering irreversibly collapses the quantum state (S ≤ 2.0), triggering an anomaly signal without software intervention; (2) The anomaly signal drives an ultra-fast optoelectronic Pockels shutter and galvanic power bus crowbar that physically air-gaps all optical interconnects and grounds compute rails in under 7.0 ns (> 80 dB extinction ratio); and (3) We derive information-theoretic bounds proving that the maximum exfiltrated data packet during cutoff is strictly bounded by ΔI < 100 bytes, preventing autonomous model migration. Finally, we map this hardware interlock directly to corporate board oversight duties under the Delaware Caremark Standard, establishing that failure to implement non-software physical-layer kill-switches constitutes bad-faith breach of fiduciary duty.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.