Skip to content

Replication package: regime-conditional prediction-decision coupling in uncertainty-aware deep reinforcement learning for trading systems

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Stock Market Forecasting Methods

Abstract

This record contains the complete replication material for a study of how strongly adistributional prediction model should be coupled to a sequential decision policy in low-signal,non-stationary markets. The manuscript evaluates fifteen coupling-mechanism configurations acrossthree walk-forward windows on five indices in three markets (CSI 300, CSI 500, S&P 500, Nasdaq,Hang Seng) under a statistical audit protocol frozen in advance. Contents scripts/ - 37 analysis scripts: environment and feature construction, theConv1d-LSTM-Transformer encoder, preference-conditioned SAC training, the fifteen mechanismconfigurations, walk-forward evaluation, the tercile block-bootstrap audit, the four switching-rulebacktests, matched-dial and matched-exposure controls, and the revision analyses (Benjamini-Hochbergand Holm multiplicity control, two-level day-by-seed inference, regime-definition robustness). data/per_day_returns/ - per-day log returns of the W0 test window for everymechanism and seed in all five markets (250 files, transaction costs included, no futureinformation). audit/ - every audit result file behind the tables and figures, including the270-cell tercile grid with q-values, the two-level bootstrap output, the regime partitions and theregime-definition robustness results. configs/configs.json - environment, encoder, SAC and mechanism hyperparameters, thefrozen protocol blocks and the walk-forward window definitions. PROTOCOL_CHRONOLOGY.md - dated protocol history: which rules and parameters werefixed before the results they evaluate and which analyses were added later. TABLE_MAP.md and README_REPRODUCE.md - the mapping from every table andfigure to the script and artefact that produce it, with the commands. checksums.sha256 - SHA-256 of every file (POSIX paths). The material is anonymized for double-anonymized peer review; the author list and the link to thepublished article will be added on acceptance. Code is released under the MIT licence, data anddocumentation under CC BY 4.0.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.