Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Trustworthy Federated Intrusion Detection for the Future Internet: A Critical Review and Evaluation Framework

Oct 2026 · Preprints.org
Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Abstract

Federated intrusion detection for the Future Internet must operate across heterogeneous devices, distributed telemetry, changing traffic patterns, and adversarial clients. This critical structured review synthesizes a targeted corpus of 37 publications and standards, including 20 Future Internet articles, coded on six methodological evidence dimensions using a transparent ordinal rubric. Federated-learning relevance received the highest mean coverage score (3.32/5; 24 of 37 records scored at least 3), followed by reproducibility (2.89/5; 19 of 37). Evidence for robustness (1.19/5; 10 of 37), generalization (1.00/5; 7 of 37), explainability (1.27/5; 7 of 37), and deployment realism (1.59/5; 10 of 37) was markedly sparser. Only five records scored at least 3 on both robustness and generalization. These results describe the methods addressed in a purposefully selected literature corpus, not the performance of deployed detection systems. Based on the observed coverage gaps, we propose a reproducible evaluation framework encompassing non-independent and identically distributed federation, disjoint and open-set testing, poisoning and backdoor attacks, leakage auditing, explanation stability, and edge-resource measurements. A supplementary Excel workbook separates original source-level coding from formula-linked analyses and sensitivity checks. Trustworthy federated intrusion detection should be evaluated through this joint systems-level evidence rather than closed-world predictive accuracy alone.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.