Skip to content

An analytical database for reinforced concrete structural walls based on an experimentally validated ML-integrated modeling framework

Oct 2026 · Structures · 33 references
Seismic Performance and Analysis Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

Abstract

Experimental datasets of reinforced concrete (RC) structural walls remain limited in both size and parameter diversity, leaving important regions of the design space underrepresented and constraining the development of reliable predictive models. To address these limitations, this study develops an analytical database through nonlinear cyclic simulations using a previously experimentally validated machine learning-integrated modeling framework implemented in OpenSeesPy. The database systematically expands underrepresented combinations of axial load ratio, concrete compressive strength, and reinforcement detailing. A hybrid deterministic–LHS parametric sampling strategy combines engineering-informed reinforcement configurations with Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) of concrete compressive strength and axial load ratio, while maintaining the experimentally validated reference specimen geometry, shear-span ratio, fixed-base boundary condition, and cyclic loading protocol. Concrete compressive strength and axial load ratio vary from 20 to 60 MPa and from 5% to 45%, respectively, while the investigated reinforcement ratios span 0.54–3.50% for boundary longitudinal reinforcement, 0.40–3.20% for boundary transverse reinforcement, 0.15–1.20% for vertical web reinforcement, and 0.05–0.60% for horizontal web reinforcement. A total of 620 nonlinear cyclic simulations are performed based on the experimentally validated wall specimen. The resulting database includes complete hysteretic responses together with key engineering response parameters, including maximum lateral strength, yield displacement, ultimate displacement capacity, ductility ratio, and FEMA P-2208-based failure mode classification. The results show that axial load ratio exhibits the strongest association with displacement ductility within the investigated parameter domain, with increasing axial compression leading to significant reductions in deformation capacity and response variability. In contrast, reinforcement detailing primarily affects ductility within low- and moderate-axial-load regimes, while its influence diminishes under high axial compression demands. The proposed analytical database provides a physically consistent and experimentally grounded resource for performance-based seismic assessment, interpretable machine learning, and future data-driven modeling of RC structural wall behavior within the investigated applicability domain.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.