Skip to content

Towards Fair and Robust Graph Federated Learning via Incentive Mechanisms

Oct 2026 · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · 16 references
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Graph federated learning (FL) allows multiple agents to collaboratively train a global graph model while preserving data privacy. However, current methods overlook the issue of low-quality or malicious data contributions, which can degrade the global model’s performance. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a novel incentive mechanism for graph FL, called GFLValue. We identify two main challenges in graph federated learning: agents causing harm and those contributing with delays. Our framework introduces an agent valuation function based on two criteria: gradient alignment and graph diversity. To balance accuracy and fairness, motif prototypes are used to enhance the global model aggregation and support local optimization. Additionally, we incorporate Gaussian noise into GFLValue to ensure Differential Privacy (DP), creating a privacy-preserving version, GFLValue+. In the case of malicious agents, we observe that local and global motif prototypes can distinguish between malicious and honest agents. This leads to the GFLValue-Adv framework, which integrates motif prototype distances and agent values to detect malicious behavior. Experiments show GFLValue offers the best trade-off between accuracy and fairness, while GFLValue+ enhances privacy without significantly compromising performance. GFLValue-Adv improves malicious agent detection accuracy by 11.7% and reduces training time by 6.94%.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.