Nov 2026· IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing· Vol 25, pp. 20726-20743· 0 citations· 47 references
Abstract
Remote sensing is a key enabling technology for intelligent vehicle and transportation systems, as it acquires environmental and traffic data beyond the vehicle’s visual range. However, in practical scenarios, the lack of flexible collaboration between sensing nodes and computing facilities leads to low efficiency in the link from remote data sensing to inference, making it difficult to support the effective processing of remote data and meet the requirements of real-time tasks. To address this issue, this paper proposes a vehicle-sensing-edge collaborative model for AI task scheduling and resource management, which integrates multiple vehicles, various sensing devices, and multi-RSU edge servers. This model performs integrated management of remotely collected data and subsequent related AI task scheduling and computing processes, enabling the flexible execution of AI inference tasks on task vehicles, service vehicles, sensing devices, and RSU edge servers. By collaboratively optimizing data collection paths, communication links, and computing resource allocation, the system achieves the joint optimization of task inference accuracy and overall operational cost while balancing load equilibrium and low latency. We design a hybrid algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL), which decomposes the original problem into sub-problems and combines the Softmax Deep Double Deterministic Policy Gradient (SD3) algorithm with convex optimization calculations. The computational complexity and convergence performance of the proposed algorithm are analyzed in detail. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the algorithm’s inherent advantages of low complexity and fast, stable convergence guarantee the effectiveness of problem-solving. Meanwhile, comparative experiments with 5 comparison schemes under 6 typical scenarios are conducted, which fully verify the superiority of the proposed scheme.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026