Sep 2026· Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications· Vol 19, pp. 154-161· 0 citations
TL;DR
The goal of this review was to thoroughly review the literature on digital procedures for complete dentures published between 2016 and 2025, find the most important technology aspects, evaluate the reported clinical outcomes, and point out areas where more research is needed.
Abstract
The use of digital technology into removable prosthodontics resulted in the creation of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflows for complete denture construction. Although digital dentures are becoming more popular in clinical practice, the evidence base is still fragmented in terms of workflow processes and manufacturing methods. The goal of this review was to thoroughly review the literature on digital procedures for complete dentures published between 2016 and 2025, find the most important technology aspects, evaluate the reported clinical outcomes, and point out areas where more research is needed. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. There were electronic searches done on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Clinical trials, observational studies, technical papers, and case series describing fully digital or hybrid procedures for entire denture production were all considered eligible. Twenty-five (25) studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
The literature shows a quick transition from subtractive to additive manufacturing. While milled bases remain the gold standard for physical qualities and preservation, 3D printing is more cost-effective. Hybrid procedures, which combine analogue functional impressions and digital manufacturing, now provide the best consistent clinical outcomes for complex edentulous ridges. Digital workflow is a proven paradigm change, but the research so far shows that milled bases are better than 3D-printed. “no-try-in” procedure presents considerable aesthetic challenges, necessitating the utilization of printed monolithic try-in. Future studies should focus on long-term clinical evaluation of digital workflows, improved wear resistance of 3D-printed resins, and enhanced scanning accuracy for edentulous arches. High-quality comparative clinical studies with standardized methodologies and long-term follow-up are needed to establish evidence-based protocols for complete denture fabrication.
Introduction
The complete removable denture (CRD, PAT) remains the standard treatment for completely edentulous patients. The conventional protocol is complex, time-consuming, and highly dependent on the expertise of the clinician and the dental technician. The integration of digital technologies (subtractive and addit...
Thiermo Sow, Saad Aroussi, Deo Hounyetin et al.· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
Abstract This scoping review mapped the evidence on the clinical applicability and implications of digital workflows for fixed and removable full-arch rehabilitation in completely edentulous patients, focusing on workflow-related operational parameters and clinician-reported outcomes. This review was conducted in accor...
Porto Carreiro Adriana da Fonte, A. Ribeiro, Gülçe Çakmak et al.· Brazilian Oral Research· 1 citation
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical success of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) dental prostheses in terms of biological outcomes, marginal adaptation, patient satisfaction, and comfort.Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting...
Y. Ramadhany, Lenni Indriani, I. D. Habar et al.· Journal of Dentomaxillofacia...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Marginal and internal adaptation are important determinants of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM zirconia fixed restorations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the influence of workflow type (digital versus analogue impression workflows) on the clinical marginal and internal fi...
Passent Ellakany, K. Farrag, Faisal Suliman Altamimi et al.· Prosthesis· 0 citations
AR and MR were applied predominantly as intraoperative visualization and navigation aids and showed accuracy superior to freehand execution, whereas AI functioned as an enabling technology confined to the preparatory stages of the workflow.
M. Pinós, N. Sesma, Giovani Flach et al.· E -journal of dentistry· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.