This work presents Euler, a human-centered mathematical research system built around a shared, structured representation of the research process that allows researchers to trace how results are developed and supplies agents with persistent, task-relevant knowledge for planning, collaboration, and verification across sessions.
Abstract
Mathematical research drives scientific discovery, and recent advances in AI for mathematics have shown that language-model agents can solve challenging problems and develop substantial mathematical proofs. Yet much of today's AI-for-mathematics work centers on obtaining a final answer. This emphasis leaves the exploration behind a result difficult for researchers to understand, while long-running investigations face fragmented context and the risk of unsupported claims propagating across reasoning steps. We present Euler, a human-centered mathematical research system built around a shared, structured representation of the research process. Euler organizes mathematical statements, assumptions, proof dependencies, alternative approaches, failed attempts, and verification evidence into connected research graphs. This representation allows researchers to trace how results are developed and supplies agents with persistent, task-relevant knowledge for planning, collaboration, and verification across sessions. Researchers can also select a graph node linked to a saved team state, revisit the agents'earlier reasoning, and explore alternative directions through continued interaction. We illustrate Euler's capabilities through three mathematical research case studies and describe the implemented system and its software validation.
Using frontier agent harnesses to tackle mathematical research problems has emerged as an effective means of advancing mathematics. However, solving frontier problems in mathematics may require a massive number of agents working in parallel for extended periods to construct proofs, thereby generating an enormous volume...
Jun-Yi Zhang, Jin-Xi Yu, E. Jiang et al.· 1 citation
Many mathematical research agents focus on solving problems with fixed statements. However, conjecture research, especially in applied mathematics, may require revising candidate questions or conclusions as investigation proceeds, coupling problem formulation with proof development. We present PACE, a research-proof ag...
Shu-Rong Miao, Fei-Ming Wang, Wen-Tao Long et al.· 0 citations
This work forms a unified approach to capability formation and process-centered evaluation, enabling discovery behavior to be trained, improved, and measured beyond final-answer performance.
CAIRN is presented, a fact-intent-driven multi-agent paradigm for goal-directed exploration that represents observations and planned investigations as a dynamic directed acyclic graph (DAG) and shows the potential of DAG-guided parallel exploration.
Zu-Yao Xu, Yue-Yang Jia, Jun-Wei Guan et al.· 0 citations
AI agents can now search literature, generate hypotheses, analyze datasets, and run experiments at a scale difficult for researchers to match. Yet scaling scientific execution does not automatically scale researchers'ability to make sense of what agents produce. When researchers return to a long-horizon run, they must...
Sang-Ho Suh, J. Chang, Pao Siangliulue et al.· 0 citations
Nontrivial dynamics can emerge in large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems, and preliminary evidence exists that formalisms from statistical mechanics can be effective at modeling and predicting such behaviors. In parallel, designing multi-agent communication topology for optimal task-solving is an active r...
Wen-Wen Zheng, Yuzhe Yang, Helen Qu et al.· 0 citations