It is demonstrated that learning when to reveal and reconsider tokens can improve the accuracy-compute trade-off without updating the decoder backbone.
Abstract
Masked diffusion language models expose an inference-time choice: which positions become visible after each denoising pass. Many existing decoding methods use hand-designed rules or require visibility to grow monotonically. We present a $\textbf{T}$iny $\textbf{I}$nference-time $\textbf{P}$olicy for $\textbf{S}$caling ($\textbf{TIPS}$), an approximately $600$K-parameter controller that learns both unmasking and remasking while keeping the underlying language model frozen. TIPS uses visibility-aware confidence features and a shallow transformer to select which tokens should be visible, while a fixed schedule controls the expected visible fraction. We train the controller through supervised warmup followed by reinforcement learning from terminal correctness rewards. On GSM8K and MATH-500 with LLaDA-8B-Instruct, the full-canvas and two-block TIPS variants achieve $58.46\%$ and $57.97\%$ micro-averaged accuracy at a budget of $32$ decoder evaluations, exceeding the strongest baseline in our main comparison by $12.1$ and $11.6$ percentage points, respectively. Both variants are trained at a budget of $32$ evaluations and remain competitive at higher budgets without retraining. These results demonstrate that learning when to reveal and reconsider tokens can improve the accuracy-compute trade-off without updating the decoder backbone.
This paper formally proves how such a feat is possible with a formal approach to lossy speculative decoding called mentored decoding, and uncovers key properties of mentored decoding, among which the particularly appealing geometric nature of the total variation case.
Vivien Tran-Thien, Richard Nock· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work identifies a systematic upstream/downstream structure in dLLM rollouts and proposes Informed Masking (IM), which derives a per-token priority score from the denoising trajectory at zero extra inference cost and biases mask sampling toward downstream tokens.
Xiao-Yi Yu, E. Sangineto, Pei Fu et al.· Conference on Empirical Meth...· 0 citations
The empirical risk minimizer trained under any masking distribution attains per-token excess $\varepsilon'$ on that distribution from $\varepsilon'^{-\mathcal{O}(\tau_c\log|\mathcal{V}|)}$ training sequences, independent of sequence length $N.
A family of open-weights foundation models for forecasting with multivariate context, which is among the most accurate models with a context of nearly a year and its calibration, its rollout strategy on long horizons, and its robustness to missing data are examined.
Lucas Meyer, Claudio Sole, Hui-Kan Xiang et al.· arXiv.org· 6 citations
These results give expected policy-loss consistency for the fixed-horizon generative-reset approximate-ERM procedure with exact action scores and provide an explicit residual-decay criterion for FIFO/interleaved SGD.
We ask how much an autoregressive transformer retains of its prompt after generating $t$ tokens. Consider two different prompts followed by the same continuation text, so that any difference in their hidden states comes from the prompt alone, and we find that the distance between their hidden states decays approximatel...
Shu-Yang Xiang· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.