Skip to content

Dynamic Monitoring and Emergency Collaborative Decision-Making for Logistics Supply Chain Risks Integrating GD-AHP and MADRL

Oct 2026 · Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Abstract

Since there are various uncertain influences that affect the operation of the logistics supply chain, the existing supervision method cannot offer timely and efficient historical data, while the supply-demand relationship still needs enhancement. Therefore, this study puts forward a logistics supply chain risk dynamic monitoring and emergency collaborative decision-making framework based on Group Decision-Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning. The framework aims to solve problems such as weak coordination in dynamic evolution and emergency decision-making of modern logistics supply chains, as well as insufficient coupling of multi-source risks. The framework first conducts risk level quantification and real-time monitoring. It combines Temporal Convolutional Network to extract spatiotemporal features and dynamically evaluate supply chain risks. It also introduces Exponentially Weighted Moving Average and other methods to generate emergency collaborative decision-making outputs. According to experimental results, the proposed model can monitor the disruption events accurately with 94.02% and the recall rate with 95.64%. In addition, the early warning delay is only 37.23 ms for monitoring the supply chain disruptions dataset under risk dynamic monitoring. In emergency coordination, the collaborative decision-making reward reaches 1.38 ± 0.10, the disruption loss reduction rate reaches 28.61% ± 8.11%, the resource utilization rate reaches 78.56%, and the task completion rate reaches 91.49%. The results clearly demonstrate that the model is superior to other models in terms of risk recognition accuracy, emergency response delay, resource use efficiency, and decision-making rewards for collaboration. The model is highly efficient in dynamic monitoring and provides effective emergency decision-making support for logistics chains. By improving risk perception, response coordination, and resource allocation efficiency, the proposed framework enhances operational resilience and disruption response capability of logistics chains.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.