Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

Bringing Reinforcement Learning to Multi-Period Financial Planning: A Bridge Between Learning-Enabled and Stochastic Optimization

Aug 2026 · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics · 0 citations

Abstract

Financial planning is rarely a one-shot decision: today’s saving, spending, and investment choices shape tomorrow’s wealth, liabilities, and goal attainment. This survey traces the mathematical evolution of multi-period financial planning over the past several decades, focusing on selected key methods ranging from classical stochastic optimization to learning-enabled decision systems. We begin with Markowitz’s single-period mean–variance optimization and trace the field’s evolution toward two major multi-period optimization paradigms: scenario-based approaches, such as multi-stage stochastic programming (MSP), and state-space approaches, including model-based dynamic programming (DP) and model-free reinforcement learning (RL). While traditional MSP and DP provide the mathematical backbone for sequential financial decision-making, their practical application has long been constrained by the curse of dimensionality, model misspecification, and restrictive assumptions required for tractability. Recent advances in model-free RL create new opportunities for adaptive and scalable sequential decision-making without relying on rigid transition models or handcrafted scenario trees. Building on this foundation, we review recent RL applications in multi-period financial planning for both individuals and institutions and classify the literature into three roles: hybrid RL, scalable RL, and end-to-end RL. Finally, we discuss the evolving landscape of AI/ML-driven automated investing, highlighting its promise for algorithmic financial planning as well as key challenges regarding data, interpretability, trust, and regulation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.