Aug 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel approach to computing leveraging dynamic topology neural-spike networks. The core idea centers on mimicking the self-adaptive topology structures found in biological neural networks to achieve higher efficiency and robustness in complex computational tasks. We introduce a programmable hardware platform composed of simulated neurons with dynamic connections and synaptic plasticity. Utilizing machine learning algorithms, specifically reinforcement learning, we continuously optimize the network topology in response to task demands, encompassing node addition, removal, and weight adjustments. This dynamic adaptation allows the network to real-time adjust to fluctuating input data, realizing adaptive computation. The innovation lies in the *dynamic* topology, contrasting with static structures or simplified models in existing neural-spike computing systems. By integrating parallel processing with machine learning optimization, our framework promises enhanced computational efficiency and resilience, representing a significant advancement over conventional neural-spike computing paradigms. The key mathematical framework revolves around representing the network topology as a graph (G = (V, E)), where V is the set of nodes (neurons) and E is the set of edges (connections) with associated weights. The dynamics of the network are governed by the following stochastic differential equations: d*s*i/dt = ∑j∈N(i) *w*ij *s*j + *f*i, where *s*i is the state of neuron *i*, *w*ij is the synaptic weight connecting neuron *i* to neuron *j*, *N(i)* is the set of neurons connected to neuron *i*, and *f*i represents a stochastic input or intrinsic noise. The learning process is formulated as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), and the policy is learned using reinforcement learning algorithms, aiming to maximize the expected reward. The core of the system can be represented as: R = ∑i αi *s*i, where αi is the activation function of neuron *i*. The system is designed to minimize the error between the output and the desired output, using a cost function: E = ∑i || *s*i - *t*i||2.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.