Aug 2026· Cluster Computing· Vol 29· 0 citations· 217 references
TL;DR
A review of federated learning through a structured taxonomy that covers its core architectural paradigms, major learning types, model training approaches, and aggregation mechanisms, and analyzes the principal challenges confronting FL, including privacy and security risks, statistical and system heterogeneity, communication constraints, and global model divergence.
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for distributed intelligence, enabling collaborative model training across multiple clients without transferring raw data to a central server. By preserving data locality, FL addresses fundamental limitations of conventional centralized machine learning, particularly with respect to privacy protection, security exposure, communication overhead, and the management of large-scale heterogeneous data. With the rapid expansion of FL into diverse application domains, ensuring the trustworthiness, scalability, and performance of federated systems has become increasingly important. This paper presents a review of federated learning through a structured taxonomy that covers its core architectural paradigms, major learning types, model training approaches, and aggregation mechanisms. Moreover, it analyzes the principal challenges confronting FL, including privacy and security risks, statistical and system heterogeneity, communication constraints, and global model divergence. In response to these issues, the review further discusses targeted solutions designed to address each challenge and improve the efficiency and reliability of federated frameworks. By combining taxonomy-driven analysis with challenge-oriented solution mapping, this study provides an insightful reference for advancing both the theoretical understanding and practical deployment of federated learning systems.
Large language models (LLMs) have become core components of cloud-based intelligent services in academia and industry, yet their training and deployment are hindered by high computational costs, data centralization, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) offers a decentralized training paradigm that enables clients to collaboratively train a learning model without sharing raw data, making it a promising solution for privacy-preserving LLM training and reasoning. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of federated prompt learning (FPL) to review recent advances in integrating the federated learning paradigm and large language models, answering the following research questions: RQ1: The fundamental motivations, characteristics, and enabling technologies of FPL, and how it differs from conventional FL and full-model federated fine-tuning; RQ2: The trade-offs FPL approaches exhibit in performance, communication efficiency, computational overhead, scalability, personalization, and heterogeneity handling; RQ3: The remaining security, privacy, robustness, and system challenges, along with key future research directions. To this end, we systematically examine existing FPL methods across the full model lifecycle: pre-training, fine-tuning, and practical applications, while discussing security, privacy, and robustness issues and summarizing existing defense mechanisms. Finally, we highlight open challenges and future directions, aiming to help readers understand how the insights drive research in FPL.
Qinglin Yang, Chen Qiu, Hongyu Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Federated Machine Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach for collaborative model training without sharing raw data, thereby preserving privacy. However, integrating FL with modern MLOps practices poses unique challenges in automating and securing the Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. This paper proposes Federated MLOps, a framework that combines CI/CD principles with federated model training to enable secure, automated, and efficient deployment of distributed ML models. We describe the system architecture, security mechanisms, and pipeline orchestration strategies, and demonstrate the framework through a case study evaluating performance, scalability, and privacy preservation. Our results highlight the potential of Federated MLOps to enhance model reliability, reproducibility, and security in distributed learning environments.
Ibrahim Yusuf, Amina Bello· International Journal of Mac...· 0 citations
An in-depth analysis of federated learning methods and paying special attention to the issue of privacy is provided, which examines new developments, concerns and tradeoffs connected with privacy, effectiveness of communication, model noise, and scalability of systems.
Aarav Mehta· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple intelligent devices to collaboratively train a high-accuracy model without sharing raw data. However, due to its distributed nature, FL is vulnerable to Byzantine attacks. Existing defense methods rely on strong assumptions, such as the proportion of malicious devices not exceeding 50\%, or the server having an additional root dataset that matches the training task. Moreover, they show limited efficacy as they overlook $(i)$ the divergence among benign updates and $(ii)$ the curse of dimensionality involved in comparing two high-dimensional updates. To solve these concerns, we propose FL-OA, a Byzantine-robust federated learning framework utilizing outsourced auditing. In FL-OA, the server collaborates with third-party organization that holds an additional root dataset to perform outsourced auditing, thereby enabling the server to achieve robust aggregation without strong assumptions. Additionally, FL-OA introduces a gradient ascent step and a correction term during local training to mitigate the divergence among benign updates, and designs a parameter importance indicator to extract critical parameters for auditing, alleviating the curse of dimensionality. We further provide a detailed theoretical analysis of FL-OA. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FL-OA outperforms existing defense methods against Byzantine attacks.
Hongliang Zhang, Zhongyuan Yu, Fenghua Xu et al.· 0 citations