Skip to content

Who Knows? On Schelling’s Monism

Jul 2026 · Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia · Vol 82, pp. 153-170 · 0 citations

Abstract

This article argues that when viewed as the culmination of an evolving project, Schelling’s monism ought to be understood as an existence monism as opposed to a priority monism. It makes this case through an analysis of the young Schelling’s relationship to Neoplatonism and Spinozism. After presenting Naomi Fisher’s case for reading Schelling as a priority monist inspired by the Neoplatonists it argues that the themes of eternity and duration in Spinoza’s Ethics provide Schelling the framework for defeating what he calls the “subjectivization” of reason in the 1804 System of Philosophy. This defeat is accomplished by the elimination of any ontological distinction between who knows, what is known, and knowledge itself. The elimination of these distinctions entails a form of existence monism without need for the Neoplatonic dynamics of procession and return. The article concludes with some implications of the defense of existence monism provided therein regarding the transition from Schelling’s system of identity to his system of freedom.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Bertrand Russell’s Logicism versus Immanuel Kant’s Antinomies of Reason

The article argues that the logicism through which Russell approached Kant’s antinomies possessed a distinct character, determined by: a) discovery of paradoxes, and b) theory of types as finding ways to solve them. The paper demonstrates both the strengths and weaknesses of Russell’s logicism regarding his approach to...

Viktor Kozlovskyi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Deleuze's problematic principle of sufficient reason: From Hume to Bergson

The significance of the principle of sufficient reason for the philosophy of Deleuze has long been recognized. Predominantly drawing from Deleuze's two 1968 publications, Difference and Repetition and Expressionism in Philosophy , commentators have tended to read Deleuze as engaging primarily with Leibniz's for...

R. Durie, Craig Lundy · 0 citations
Book 2016

Commonplace Commitments

Joseph P. Fell proposes that the solution to the problem of nihilism is found in the common experience of persons and the everyday commitments that one makes to people, practices, and institutions. In his landmark 1979 book Heidegger and Sartre, and in his subsequent essays, Fell describes a quiet but radical reform in...

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Open access 2026

The neglected argument about C. S. Peirce’s pragmaticism

This article examines Peirce’s pragmaticism from the perspective of his own retrospective assessments of his work. Taking seriously Peirce’s self-criticisms and later reformulations, the paper argues that the development of pragmatism cannot be adequately understood through isolated maxims or fragmentary readings, but...

L. Santaella · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Giving Him Up: The Ethics of Renunciation in J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace

Critics of J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace have long read its ending through the vocabularies of shame, grace, and redemption. This article argues that the novel systematically dismantles the social preconditions of redemption itself. On Lucy Lurie’s farm—a space that answers closely to Giorgio Agamben’s “state of exception”—...

Yu-Mei Liu, Jin-Hao Yang · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Which society? Whose power? What nationalism? A response to and questioning of Siniša Malešević and Dominic Hewson

The late Foucault's relative lack of attention to such ‘imagined' categories as nationalism/ideology and modernity, as diagnosed by Malešević and Hewson respectively, and his subsequent veering off toward ancient ‘techniques and cultures of the self’, ought to be linked to his profound dissatisfaction with those modern...

D. Bartmanski, Jasen Phillips · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.