Jul 2026· 2026 5th International Conference on Energy and Electrical Power Systems (ICEEPS)· pp. 194-197· 0 citations· 13 references
Abstract
Point-to-point (P2P) energy trading serves as a critical market mechanism for promoting local consumption of distributed renewable energy. However, as P2P transactions rely on the distribution grid infrastructure, participants must pay grid usage fees to the distribution system operator (DSO). The allocation ratio of such fees directly affects the net economic benefits of both parties; an improper split may render one party’s net gain from P2P trading lower than that from direct grid interaction, violating the principle of individual rationality and undermining voluntary participation. This paper proposes a P2P matching model incorporating individual rationality constraints, with social welfare maximization as the objective, solved via a linear programming formulation. Through case-based simulation, we analyze how the fee-sharing parameter α ∈ [0,1]—denoting the buyer’s share (seller’s share being 1−α)—influences trading behavior, and compare system performance with and without grid fees. Results show that introducing grid fees encourages proximity-oriented trading. The proposed mechanism effectively reduces average transaction distance, and optimally tuning α and the fee rate enables a balanced trade-off between efficiency and profitability, offering actionable insights for P2P energy market design.
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) energy trading has emerged as a transformative approach for creating decentralized energy markets, empowering prosumers to actively participate in energy generation and consumption. This paper presents a novel P2P energy market framework that incorporates the technical constraints of physical electri...
Tran-Thanh Son, N. Anh, Ta-Xuan Hung et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Decentralized energy communities (DECs) allow households, prosumers, and small generators to trade electricity locally, improving grid flexibility and supporting renewable integration. However, local market designs often face a trade-off between efficiency and fairness. Efficiency-oriented settlement rules can produce...
Kaung Si Thu, Pikkanate Angaphiwatchawal, S. Chaitusaney· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This paper studies the strategic market participation of a monopolistic energy storage aggregator (ESA) in a day-ahead electricity market. The ESA coordinates geographically distributed storage units, submits a coordinated bid for its portfolio, and may hold financial transmission rights (FTRs). The system operator cle...
Mehdi Davoudi, Ming-Hao Mou, Jun-Jie Qin· 0 citations
To alleviate renewable energy curtailment and the high operating costs arising from the temporal and spatial mismatch of distributed generation, this paper develops a cross-park dispatch optimization approach for power systems under the joint participation of carbon trading and green certificate trading (GCT). The prop...
Chunxian Feng, Yifeng Wang, Wenxue Wang et al.· Energies· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.