This work derives exact infinite-dimensional dual reformulations, establishes out-of-sample and excess-risk guarantees, and develops a conservative Monte Carlo approximation scheme with convergence and suboptimality guarantees for piecewise affine losses.
Abstract
Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) provides a principled framework for decision-making under distributional uncertainty. Classical data-driven DRO frameworks typically construct ambiguity sets from distributional information, such as moment constraints, divergence neighborhoods, or Wasserstein balls, specified before the downstream loss is considered. We propose a task-aware DRO framework based on targeted integral probability metrics. The ambiguity set is defined directly through the loss functions induced by feasible decisions, thereby controlling the loss discrepancy between an adversarial distribution and a data-driven reference distribution. This construction leads to an expected hinge-constrained formulation that is equivalent to an infinitely constrained loss-discrepancy formulation. It also yields finite-sample guarantees that bypass the ambient curse of dimensionality: whenever an appropriate scalar pointwise concentration inequality is available for the induced loss estimator, the ambiguity radius can be calibrated at the canonical $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(N^{-1/2})$ rate after uniformization over the decision class. As a result, the framework applies broadly to settings including heavier-tailed sub-Weibull losses, Markovian data, outlier-corrupted data, and incomplete data. We derive exact infinite-dimensional dual reformulations, establish out-of-sample and excess-risk guarantees, and develop a conservative Monte Carlo approximation scheme with convergence and suboptimality guarantees. For piecewise affine losses, the sampled problems admit tractable conic reformulations. Numerical experiments in inventory management under heavy-tailed demand and regression with outlier corruption demonstrate strong out-of-sample performance relative to existing approaches.
A more flexible framework in which a predictive model determines the nominal distribution and a separate model estimates a data-dependent radius is developed, which treats calibration as a practical mechanism for reliable decision making rather than a universal guarantee of improved optimization performance.
Conformal-DRO is proposed, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law, which covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism.
Finite-sample generalization error bounds in the shifted target environment for both DRO and RS are derived, which fill a gap in understanding the statistical properties of robust learning methods under distributional shifts and provide a principled basis for comparing DRO and RS.
Zhiyi Li, Xiaojie Mao, Yun-Bei Xu et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Generative Distributionally Robust Optimization (GDRO), a principled framework that accepts any sampleable conditional generator as the nominal model and restricts worst-case laws to a chosen conditional generator family.
Zi-Wei Zhang, Jonathan Yu-Meng Li, Zhihao Jin· arXiv.org· 0 citations
It is shown that BiCS is applicable to standard DRO, almost-sure DRO, DRO with various chance constraints, and DRO with ambiguity sets strengthened by local information, and demonstrates superior performance, including solving cases where the examined compact reformulations are unavailable or computationally difficult.
This paper reduces the inner worst-case expectation problem exactly to a scalar budget allocation task, and embeds this procedure within an oracle-based distributional best-response framework to directly compute an approximate primal-dual solution to the overall DRO problem.
Guixian Chen, S. Fattahi, Soroosh Shafiee· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.