Skip to content

The Convergence Behavior of Adam under Heavy-Tailed Noise

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27383 · 1 citation · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A discounted regret analysis for Adam is developed, without restrictive parameter coupling, and the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form Adam optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise are established.

Abstract

We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form Adam optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise. While several Adam variants are known to achieve optimal iteration complexity in bounded-variance nonsmooth nonconvex optimization, little is understood about their behavior when stochastic gradients admit only a bounded $p$-th central moment for some $p \in (1,2]$, a setting increasingly observed in modern deep learning. To address this gap, we generalize the recent online-to-nonconvex conversion framework to accommodate heavy-tailed martingale-difference noise. Building on this generalized framework, we develop a discounted regret analysis for Adam, without restrictive parameter coupling. Our results show that Adam converges to $(\rho,\epsilon)$-stationary points under heavy-tailed noise. However, it exhibits a suboptimal iteration complexity and $p$-dependent convergence, a suboptimality that persists even in the bounded-variance case ($p=2$). Specifically, the $\epsilon$-dominant term in the iteration complexity for reaching in-expectation stationarity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(\Delta \rho^{1/2}(G+\sigma)^{\frac{5p}{3p-4}}\epsilon^{-\left(\frac{5p}{3p-4}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(\frac{4}{3},2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^{-13/2})$ when $p=2$. When the domain radius is known and used to control the online-learner output, a standard setup in related literature, the convergence rate improves to match the optimal complexity. In this case, the $\epsilon$-dominant iteration complexity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(\Delta \rho^{1/2}(G+\sigma)^{\frac{p}{p-1}}\epsilon^{-\left(\frac{p}{p-1}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(1,2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(\epsilon^{-7/2})$ when $p=2$. These findings provide new theoretical insight into the robustness and limitations of Adam in heavy-tailed regimes.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Role of Gradient Modification in Heavy-Tailed Nonconvex Stochastic Min-Max Optimization

It is shown that vanilla SGDA, without any modification to its update rule, can converge under heavy-tailed noise in both nonconvex-strongly-concave (NC-SC) and nonconvex-concave (NC-C) settings, establishing the first convergence guarantees for SGDA in these regimes.

Tian-Xiu Zhu, Yi Xu, Xiang-Yang Ji · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Parameter-Free Dynamic Regret under Heavy-Tailed Noise

We study online convex optimization with stochastic gradient noise whose conditional $p$-th central moment is bounded by $\sigma^p$, for an unknown $p\in(1,2]$. For losses with Lipschitz bound $G$ on a domain of diameter $D$, we obtain expected universal dynamic regret $\widetilde O(GD\sqrt{T\Lambda}+\sigma DT^{1/p}\La...

Vaneet Aggarwal · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Stochastic gradient descent with initial regularization

A variant of stochastic gradient descent with initial regularization with initial regularization is analyzed and dimension-free upper bounds on its expected excess risk for the squared loss are derived.

Nabil Kahalé · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Robust dimension-free estimation of simple random tensors: optimal guarantees under heavy tails and adversarial contamination

This work proposes the first robust estimator achieving near-optimal dimension-free statistical rates in this setting, and extends the trimmed-mean framework underlying recent advances in robust mean and covariance estimation to arbitrary tensor order.

R. Oliveira, Zoraida F. Rico, Philip Thompson · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Convergence rates for the RMSprop optimizer with full control of the hyperparameters

The key innovative new feature in the proof of the analysis are suitable inverse moment bounds for the second moment process in RMSprop that hold not just for all sufficiently large n but hold for every gradient step $n=1,2,3,...$ with all error constants being explicitly specified.

Steffen Dereich, Arnulf Jentzen · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.