Skip to content
Review Open access

RNA epitranscriptomic regulation of tumor immune evasion: mechanisms, context-dependent roles, and therapeutic implications

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Immunology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 217 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Clinical translation remains limited by insufficient specificity, tumor heterogeneity, complex crosstalk among RNA modifications, potential toxicity, and delivery barriers, so future studies integrating RNA modification mapping with single-cell, spatial, and multi-omics technologies will be essential to define cell-type-specific regulatory networks and develop precise RNA epitranscriptomic biomarkers and therapies for cancer immunotherapy.

Abstract

Tumor immune evasion is a fundamental hallmark of cancer progression and a major barrier to effective immunotherapy. RNA epitranscriptomic modifications have emerged as a critical layer of post-transcriptional regulation that links RNA fate control with tumor immune remodeling. These reversible modifications, including m6A, m5C, ac4C, m¹A, m7G, pseudouridine, m6Am, Nm, and A-to-I RNA editing, are dynamically regulated by writers, erasers, and readers. By modulating RNA stability, splicing, nuclear export, translation efficiency, degradation, and innate immune recognition, RNA modifications reshape multiple immune-related processes in cancer. Mechanistically, they regulate tumor immune visibility by influencing antigen processing, MHC-I expression, interferon signaling, and dendritic cell-mediated cross-presentation. They also control immune checkpoint expression, particularly the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, inflammatory signaling pathways, immune-cell recruitment and exhaustion, and metabolic immunosuppression within the tumor immune microenvironment. Importantly, the functions of RNA modification regulators are highly context dependent. The same regulator may either promote immune escape or enhance antitumor immunity depending on cancer type, cellular source, target transcript, reader protein, and microenvironmental state. From a clinical perspective, RNA modification-based molecular subtypes, prognostic signatures, and risk-score models show potential for predicting patient prognosis, immune infiltration, and response to immune checkpoint blockade. In parallel, targeting RNA modification regulators, alone or in combination with immunotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy, represents an emerging therapeutic strategy. However, clinical translation remains limited by insufficient specificity, tumor heterogeneity, complex crosstalk among RNA modifications, potential toxicity, and delivery barriers. Future studies integrating RNA modification mapping with single-cell, spatial, and multi-omics technologies will be essential to define cell-type-specific regulatory networks and develop precise RNA epitranscriptomic biomarkers and therapies for cancer immunotherapy.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

The role and clinical impact of aberrant m6A RNA modification in cancer

This review systematically dissects how dysregulated m6A methylation fuels malignant transformation and progression by reinforcing core oncogenic hallmarks, sustained proliferation, metastasis, metabolic rewiring, and resistance to programmed cell death.

Sheng-Jie Tang, Rangping Xie, Jiang Fu et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

RNA modifications as determinants of cancer cell death: from epitranscriptomic mechanisms to therapeutic targeting

It is argued that while epitranscriptomics represents a compelling regulatory axis in cancer cell death, advancing the field will require integrative, high-resolution, and functionally precise approaches to move beyond correlative frameworks toward mechanistic and clinically actionable insights.

A. Mukherjee, Ankit Kumar Bharti, D. Mathew et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

mRNA processing in cancer immunotherapy: emerging targets, resistance mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities

Cancer immunotherapy has improved outcomes across many tumor types, but primary and acquired resistance, tumor heterogeneity and a shortage of safe targets remain unresolved. Part of this gap arises because tumor cells evade immune recognition not only through genomic mutation but also through post-transcriptional mRNA...

Y. Yukselten, Haseeb Ahmad, Mohammed Shoultout et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

N6-methyladenosine as a potential epitranscriptomic immune rheostat during SARS-CoV-2 infection

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant internal RNA modification in eukaryotic cells, has emerged as a critical regulator of antiviral host defense. Increasing evidence indicates that m6A functions beyond conventional post-transcriptional regulation by dynamically coordinating the magnitude, timing, and duration o...

Xian-Feng Hui, Shuo-Xiang Gao, Shi-Huan Ding et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Regulatory roles of pyroptosis-associated lncRnas in breast cancer progression and immune microenvironment.

Clinical translation remains limited by dependence on retrospective transcriptomic datasets, insufficient mechanistic validation, lack of standardized assays, and scarce prospective clinical evidence, but pyroptosis-associated lncRNAs represent a promising link between tumor progression and immune regulation, with cons...

Chou-Yi Hsu, Bilal Abdulmajeed Mukhlif, O. Nematov et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Role of m6A RNA Methylation in T Cell Biology and Immunotherapy

This review focuses on the interplay between immunity and epitranscriptomics and explores the direct and indirect effects of m6A modification on T cells and highlights the pivotal role of m6A regulation in T cell biology and its potential to optimize next-generation immunotherapies.

Yumna A. Butt, Nordin D. Zandhuis, I. Foskolou · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.