A novel algorithm for very-long-baseline GNSS network adjustment that enhances robustness and reliability through an integrated optimization framework is presented and it is shown that the hybrid technique can mitigate the effect of suspicious baseline solutions and provide improved residual stability.
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) have become indispensable in establishing geodetic networks, owing to their capability to deliver high-accuracy positioning. However, the accuracy and reliability of GNSS networks can be compromised by measurement outliers and suboptimal adjustment techniques. This issue arises particularly in very-long-baseline GNSS networks, where some baseline solutions may appear suspicious. In such cases, applying the Constrained Least-Squares (CLS) technique in network adjustment does not guarantee accurate estimates, as its performance deteriorates significantly in the presence of suspicious baselines. This paper presents a novel algorithm for very-long-baseline GNSS network adjustment that enhances robustness and reliability through an integrated optimization framework. The proposed method combines robust M-estimation and baseline-wise residual clustering to achieve more reliable solutions under diverse observational conditions. Unlike the CLS approach, the proposed hybrid algorithm strengthens the overall resilience of the adjustment process against both isolated and grouped errors. Various GNSS network datasets representing different configurations are tested, with baseline lengths ranging from 227 km to 1980 km. The results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid algorithm outperforms the CLS technique in terms of geodetic accuracy and the distribution of observation residuals. It is shown that the hybrid technique can mitigate the effect of suspicious baseline solutions and provide improved residual stability. In addition, the geodetic accuracy improves by up to 71.4% and 90.0% in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively, at a single station, with average improvements of 22.1% and 22.9% among the stations showing improvement.
A RANSAC-based IDR method that dynamically adjusts qmax in a piecewise increasing manner, which consistently achieves the highest correct identification rate and the lowest WI rate among all compared methods, with competitive positioning accuracy and acceptable computational time.
Hang Yu, Yi-Peng Ning, Hou-Zeng Han et al.· Measurement science and tech...· 0 citations
Protection levels (PLs) bound position errors under specified fault hypotheses and risk budgets, but advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (ARAIM) is formulated for snapshot GNSS estimation rather than the correlated posterior of tightly coupled GNSS/IMU factor graph optimization (FGO). This paper formulate...
Jia-Hao Hu, Xiang-Ru Wang, Wei-Song Wen et al.· 0 citations
The findings confirm that the proposed framework provides a robust and effective solution for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of multi-constellation GNSS positioning in challenging, blocking-dominated environments.
K. Bahmani, M. Mosavi, A. Sadr· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Gross errors in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) coordinate time series can bias velocity and deformation estimates. Conventional three-sigma screening is prone to masking because contaminated observations inflate the residual scale. This study evaluates AEC-NDF, which estimates scale from nested central-resid...
Ming Zhang, Han Gao, Shun-Qiang Hu et al.· Geomatics· 0 citations
Although Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations are verified to suffer from mixed additive and multiplicative errors, current methodologies still rely heavily on conventional additive error models (AEMs). Furthermore, existing research on mixed additive and multiplicative error models (MAMEMs) is largel...
Guo-Hong Li, Yun Shi, Shuen Wei· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.