Skip to content

Early Stopping Without Validation Data in Weakly Supervised Learning.

Jul 2026 · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · Vol PP, pp. 1-16 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Label Wave is proposed, which does not require validation data for selecting the desired model across various weakly supervised learning paradigms, including learning with noisy labels (LNL), positive-unlabeled learning, and unlabeled-unlabeled learning.

Abstract

Early stopping is a fundamental technique for mitigating overfitting in machine learning and is especially critical in many weakly supervised learning scenarios. Conventional early stopping, however, needs a sufficiently sized and representative validation set. This creates a trade-off: dedicating more data for validation can diminish the training set and limit model performance, while an insufficient validation set may lead to sub-optimal model selection. This challenge is particularly serious in many weakly supervised learning scenarios where validation data may be entirely unavailable or unreliable. In this paper, we propose Label Wave, which does not require validation data for selecting the desired model across various weakly supervised learning paradigms, including learning with noisy labels (LNL), positive-unlabeled learning, and unlabeled-unlabeled learning. It works by tracking the changes in the model's predictions on the training set during the training process, aiming to halt training before the model excessively fits misleading patterns. This method is empirically supported by our observation that minimum fluctuations in predictions typically occur at the training epoch before the model transitions from fitting reliable patterns to misleading ones. Extensive experiments further provide large-scale evaluation for LNL across diverse noise conditions, model families, optimizers, and data modalities. Label Wave selects near-oracle checkpoints (test-accuracy oracle gaps: 0.15-0.93 percentage points in controlled sweeps and 1.90 percentage points on 71 tabular tasks) and boosts 7 LNL methods by 1.98/2.86 percentage points over 10%/20% hold-out validation.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

C-Score: Beyond Accuracy for Robustness Assessment in Semi-Supervised Learning under Open-World Unlabeled Contamination

C-Score, a compact framework that evaluates training behavior in three complementary spaces: prediction, feature representation, and optimization, suggests that clean accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating SSL robustness in open-world environments, and that internal diagnostic signals are necessary for more reli...

Tsao-Lun Chen, Chicheng Fu, Han-Yi Chou et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating Machine Learning Models in Nonstandard Settings: An Overview and New Findings

The findings corroborate the concern that standard resampling methods often yield biased GE estimates in nonstandard settings, underscoring the importance of tailored GE estimation.

R. Hornung, Malte Nalenz, Lennart Schneider et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Minimax Optimal Early-Stopped Gradient Descent for Gaussian Mixture Classification

This work shows that early stopping can overcome suboptimality: in a Gaussian mixture model with label-flipping noise, GD stopped at an appropriate oracle time achieves minimax-optimal excess zero-one risk for covariance spectra with fast and continuous decay, including polynomial and exponential spectral decays.

Alex Buna, S. Liu, Patrick Rebeschini · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Novel Regularization Methods to Prevent Overfitting in Machine Learning Models

A single taxonomy of the new regularization methods such as adaptive regularization, information-theoretic constraints, structured sparsity, stochastic regularization and regularization at the representation level is presented and Hybrid Adaptive Information Regularization (HAIR) is suggested which is a dynamic complex...

Rak esh, A. An · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Q performance 2: Toward Unbiased Selection of Machine-Learning Regression Models

Selecting a single best machine-learning regression model from a set of competing models can be challenging. While models selected based on cross-validation performance do not guarantee good predictions on external data, models selected solely on external validation performance do not ascertain precise predictions fo...

Arkaprava Banerjee, K. Roy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.