Oct 2026· Journal of Medical Screening· pp.
9691413261494999
· 0 citations· 35 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Excess lifetime risk of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in situ in the presence of program screening is estimated, as an indicator of overdiagnosis among screen-detected cases.
Abstract
ObjectivesEstimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis related to mammography screening vary substantially. Overdiagnosis is commonly defined as cases that would not have been detected during the person's remaining lifetime in the absence of screening. We here aim to quantify overdiagnosis in the population-based BreastScreen Norway mammography screening program using long-term follow-up and more detailed modeling than previous studies.SettingWe applied data on Norwegian screening patterns and breast carcinoma incidence for the period 1987-2019, covering women aged 49-84, leveraging the gradual implementation of the organized biennial BreastScreen Norway screening program for women aged 50-69 during 1995-2005.MethodsUsing an extended age-period-cohort model, we estimated excess lifetime risk of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in the presence of program screening, as an indicator of overdiagnosis among screen-detected cases.ResultsLifetime risk of breast carcinomas was 6.6% (95% confidence interval: 2.5%-10.7%) higher for invited than for non-invited women. This indicates that 18% (95% confidence interval: 7.3%-28.0%) of screen-detected cases may be overdiagnosed, and that approximately one in 86 (95% confidence interval: 54-210) screened women were overdiagnosed during their screening period. Using effect estimates from previous studies, we estimated that approximately three women are overdiagnosed for every breast cancer death prevented by screening, and that 87% of overdiagnosed tumors might grow extremely slowly.ConclusionsOverdiagnosis related to mammography screening is a considerable problem, but its extent may be smaller than reported in some previous studies. Most overdiagnosed tumors likely grow very slowly.
In England, the NHS breast screening programme routinely invites women aged 50–70 years for triennial digital mammography. While screening may reduce breast cancer mortality, it may also lead to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. In 2007, the UK Government announced an eventual extension of the screening ag...
A. Babiker, S. MacMahon, A. Halliday et al.· Trials· 0 citations
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While mammographic screening is well established for women aged 50 years and older, its implementation for those aged 40–49 years remains controversial.
Objective: This systematic review assesses t...
Nícolas Marques Barros, Igor Diniz Alves, Walter Johnatha dos Santos Pereira et al.· Mastology· 0 citations
Clinical guidelines recommend ongoing surveillance mammography for breast cancer survivors. However, little is known about longitudinal surveillance patterns among older survivors. We aimed to identify distinct surveillance mammography trajectories over five rounds of follow-up and evaluate demographic, clinical,...
Lu-Chang Cui, Swarnavo Sarkar, Eunji Choi et al.· Cancer Epidemiology, Biomark...· 0 citations
Introduction: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among Brazilian women and the most common cancer in this population. Early diagnosis is crucial, offering up to a 95% survival rate. The Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA) estimated approximately 73,610 new cases in Brazil for 2025. The state of...
Antonio Railman Oliveira Gouvêa· Mastology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.