Aug 2026· Journal of imaging informatics in medicine· 0 citations· 229 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A structured foundation and classification approach is provided to meaningfully evaluate and advance interpretable AI model approaches in echocardiography and highlights the distinct challenges and promising research directions for each approach.
Abstract
Echocardiography is a central modality for cardiac diagnosis; rising clinical demand and advances in machine learning have accelerated AI development for automated analysis. As these systems may influence high-stakes decisions, model interpretability is essential for clinical trust and accountability. In this review, we define interpretable AI model approaches as strategies that improve interpretability through intrinsically interpretable components within transparent models or post hoc explainable AI (XAI) for black-box models. We synthesized 170 echocardiography studies using interpretable AI model approaches and mapped model types, explanation strategies, and evaluation practices. To compare approach-specific patterns, studies were categorized into multistep and end-to-end frameworks, representing intermediate representation versus direct prediction. Multistep studies were more prevalent and typically combined convolutional neural network (CNN)-based upstream models with intrinsically interpretable downstream approaches. End-to-end studies included more complex architectures, with the most common pairing being CNN-based models with class activation mapping-based visualizations. Evaluation practices also differed by framework. Multistep studies more frequently reported quantitatively defined clinical metrics and included several studies demonstrating prospective, application-level implementation. In contrast, at the model-approach instance level, end-to-end instances relied more often on qualitative-grounded evaluation than multistep upstream instances (23/57, 40.4% vs. 2/122, 1.6%). Collectively, these findings highlight the distinct challenges and promising research directions for each approach: multistep models may benefit from more advanced architectures, whereas end-to-end models require more deliberate post hoc explanation methods and stronger quantitative evaluation to support clinical translation. This work, therefore, provides a structured foundation and classification approach to meaningfully evaluate and advance interpretable AI model approaches in echocardiography.
It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.
Riya Jacob K· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
A comprehensive overview of eXplainable AI techniques applied in the diagnosis of cancer in nine major organs, including the lungs, skin, brain, breast, gastrointestinal, colorectal, kidney, prostate, and ovary is provided.
Muhammad Hassan, Muhammad Zubair, Rozeena Ibrahim et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This review provides a comprehensive and structured synthesis of FMs in medical image analysis by systematically organizing studies into two primary categories: vision-only foundation models (VFMs) and vision-language foundation models (VLFMs), based on their architectural foundations, training strategies, and downstre...
P. Rajendran, M. Safari, Wen-Feng He et al.· Medical Image Analysis· 0 citations
A multiview video-language framework improved report retrieval compared with conventional image-based approaches and support the utility of video-based, multiview representation learning for echocardiographic report retrieval.
R. Takizawa, Chiemi Yamazaki, S. Kodera et al.· JACC: Asia· 0 citations
This work developed an interactive application that enables readers to engage directly with model-generated heatmaps as they form their diagnoses, and conducted a user study to evaluate how this influences diagnostic behaviour and accuracy.
E. Dack, C. Dai, H. Hoppe et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Most artificial intelligence (AI) models used in radiology are black boxes-they produce predictions without explaining the basis of their outputs, raising concerns about clinical safety, accountability, and trust. To address this, a growing body of methods has been developed to help clinicians understand and evaluate A...
Gorkem Durak, H. Aktas, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli et al.· Diagnostic and Interventiona...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.